MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Digestive diseases and sciences · 1987

Topical 5-aminosalicylic acid versus prednisolone in ulcerative proctosigmoiditis. A randomized, double-blind multicenter trial. Danish 5-ASA Group.

Клиническое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

The therapeutic efficacy of a slightly acidic, buffered suspension of 1000 mg 5-aminosalicylic acid (Pentasa) was compared with that of 25 mg prednisolone following daily rectal administration to outpatients with mild to moderate proctosigmoiditis. The study was carried out as a randomized, double-blind trial in seven gastroenterological departments. A total of 123 patients were included of whom 114 completed the study (53 5-aminosalicylic acid, 61 prednisolone). The patient population was representative for the disease as it ordinarily appears in medical outpatient clinics. After 14 days, patients in total remission discontinued the treatment, while the rest were treated for another two-week period. Improvement or remission was seen in 77% of the 5-aminosalicylic acid-treated patients and in 72% of the prednisolone-treated patients (P greater than 0.05). More than half the patients requiring prolonged treatment benefited from it, which points to an advantage of extended therapy. Side effects were few and mild. It is concluded that the applied suspension of 5-aminosalicylic acid is at least as efficient as prednisolone for topical treatment of patients with slightly to moderately active proctosigmoiditis.

Для цитирования: Topical 5-aminosalicylic acid versus prednisolone in ulcerative proctosigmoiditis. A randomized, double-blind multicenter trial. Danish 5-ASA Group.. Digestive diseases and sciences. 1987.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.