DOI 10.1016/j.cjca.2019.11.013
A Province-Wide Analysis of the Epidemiology of Thoracic Aortic Disease: Incidence Is Increasing in a Sex-Specific Way.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
The contemporary incidence and prevalence of thoracic aortic aneurysm and dissection (TAAD) remains understudied. Epidemiological research on TAAD has been limited by incomplete case identification within administrative data sources. The objectives of this study were to develop a case identification method and determine the incidence and prevalence of TAAD, based on data from Manitoba, Canada.
METHODS
Hospital records and medical claims housed at the Manitoba Centre for Health Policy, and data from the Manitoba Thoracic Aortic Diseases Clinic were used to develop a case definition and identify patients with TAAD in Manitoba, Canada. The age-standardized incidence and prevalence of thoracic aortic disease was determined and stratified by sex from 1998 to 2016.
RESULTS
We identified 4264 patients with TAAD, of whom 63% were male. The age standardized incidence was 2 times higher in men, peaking at 42 cases per 100,000 in 2013. Although the overall incidence was lower in female patients, the number of incident cases increased 68% compared with 25% in male patients. In hospitalized patients, the incidence and prevalence of aneurysms increased over time, whereas the incidence of dissection and rupture has remained stable.
CONCLUSIONS
The use of a novel case identification method provided a more complete description of the epidemiology of TAAD. The incidence and prevalence of TAAD is rising, more so in female patients over time. These data support increased resource allocation to thoracic aortic diseases clinics to ensure appropriate monitoring, treatment, and follow-up for the growing number patients with thoracic aortic disease.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.