MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/00368504221124055

Медицинская библиотека · Science progress · 2022

Investigation of inflammation-related parameters in patients with candidemia hospitalized in the intensive care unit: A retrospective cohort study.

Tunay Burcu, Aydin Selda

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Candidemia is the most common invasive fungal disease in intensive care units (ICUs).

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to investigate cases of candidemia infection developing in the ICU and factors associated with mortality due to this infection.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

This is a retrospective study including patients admitted to a tertiary university hospital ICU between January 2012 and December 2020. Patients over 18 years of age who had candida growth in at least one blood culture taken from central or peripheral samples (>48 h after admission to the ICU) without concurrent growth were evaluated.

RESULTS

The study group consisted of 136 patients with candida. Eighty-seven (63.97%) patients were male, with a median age of 69.5 (59-76.5) years. The 7-day mortality rate was 35.29%, while the 30-day mortality rate was 69.11%. As a result of multiple logistic regression analysis, after adjusting for age and malignancy, high APACHE II score and low platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) - were found to be significant factors in predicting both 7-day and 30-day mortality.

CONCLUSION

In this study, PLR and APACHE II scores were shown to be independent predictors of mortality in patients with candidemia in the ICU.

Для цитирования: Tunay Burcu, Aydin Selda. Investigation of inflammation-related parameters in patients with candidemia hospitalized in the intensive care unit: A retrospective cohort study.. Science progress. 2022. DOI: 10.1177/00368504221124055.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.