Modelling lower-limb peripheral arterial disease using clinically available datasets: impact of inflow boundary conditions on hemodynamic indices for restenosis prediction.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The integration of hemodynamic markers as risk factors in restenosis prediction models for lower-limb peripheral arteries is hindered by fragmented clinical datasets. Computed tomography (CT) scans enable vessel geometry reconstruction and can be obtained at different times than the Doppler ultrasound (DUS) images, which provide information on blood flow velocity. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations allow the computation of near-wall hemodynamic indices, whose accuracy depends on the prescribed inlet boundary condition (BC), derived from the DUS images. This study aims to: (i) investigate the impact of different DUS-derived velocity waveforms on CFD results; (ii) test whether the same vessel areas, subjected to altered hemodynamics, can be detected independently of the applied inlet BC; (iii) suggest suitable DUS images to obtain reliable CFD results.

METHODS: CFD simulations were conducted on three patients treated with bypass surgery, using patient-specific DUS-derived inlet BCs recorded at either the same or different time points than the CT scan. The impact of the chosen inflow condition on bypass hemodynamics was assessed in terms of wall shear stress (WSS)-derived quantities. Patient-specific critical thresholds for the hemodynamic indices were applied to identify critical luminal areas and compare the results with a reference obtained with a DUS image acquired in close temporal proximity to the CT scan.

RESULTS: The main findings indicate that: (i) DUS-derived inlet velocity waveforms acquired at different time points than the CT scan led to statistically significantly different CFD results (p<0.001); (ii) the same luminal surface areas, exposed to low time-averaged WSS, could be identified independently of the applied inlet BCs; (iii) similar outcomes were observed for the other hemodynamic indices if the prescribed inlet velocity waveform had the same shape and comparable systolic acceleration time to the one recorded in close temporal proximity to the CT scan.

CONCLUSIONS: Despite a lack of standardised data collection for diseased lower-limb peripheral arteries, an accurate estimation of luminal areas subjected to altered near-wall hemodynamics is possible independently of the applied inlet BC. This holds if the applied inlet waveform shares some characteristics - derivable from the DUS report - as one matching the acquisition time of the CT scan.