The Journal of surgical research · 2013
Ghrelin decreases motor deficits after traumatic brain injury.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lopez Nicole E, Gaston Lindsay, Lopez Karina R, Hageny Anne Marie, Putnam James, Eliceiri Brian, Coimbra Raul, Bansal Vishal
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Pharmacologic therapy for traumatic brain injury (TBI) has remained relatively unchanged for decades. Ghrelin, an endogenously produced peptide, has been shown to prevent apoptosis and blood-brain barrier dysfunction after TBI. We hypothesize that ghrelin treatment will prevent neuronal degeneration and improve motor coordination after TBI.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A weight drop model created severe TBI in three groups of BALB/c mice: Sham, TBI, and TBI + ghrelin (20 μg intraperitoneal ghrelin). Brain tissue was examined by hematoxylin and eosin and Fluoro-Jade B (FJB) staining to evaluate histologic signs of injury, cortical volume loss, and neuronal degeneration. Additionally, motor coordination was assessed.
RESULTS: Ghrelin treatment prevented volume loss after TBI (19.4 ± 9.8 mm(3)versus 71.4 ± 31.4 mm(3); P < 0.05). Similarly, although TBI increased FJB-positive neuronal degeneration, ghrelin treatment decreased FJB staining in TBI resulting in immunohistologic patterns similar to sham. Compared with sham, TBI animals had a significant increase in foot faults at d 1, 3, and 7 (2.75 ± 0.42; 2.67 ± 0.94; 3.33 ± 0.69 versus 0.0 ± 0.0; 0.17 ± 0.19; 0.0 ± 0.0; P < 0.001). TBI + ghrelin animals had significantly decreased foot faults compared with TBI at d 1, 3, and 7 (0.42 ± 0.63; 0.5 ± 0.43; 1.33 ± 0.58; P versus TBI <0.001; P versus sham = NS).
CONCLUSIONS: Ghrelin treatment prevented post-TBI cortical volume loss and neurodegeneration. Furthermore, ghrelin improved post-TBI motor deficits. The mechanisms of these effects are unclear; however, a combination of the anti-apoptotic and inflammatory modulatory effects of ghrelin may play a role. Further studies delineating the mechanism of these observed effects are warranted.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A weight drop model created severe TBI in three groups of BALB/c mice: Sham, TBI, and TBI + ghrelin (20 μg intraperitoneal ghrelin). Brain tissue was examined by hematoxylin and eosin and Fluoro-Jade B (FJB) staining to evaluate histologic signs of injury, cortical volume loss, and neuronal degeneration. Additionally, motor coordination was assessed.
RESULTS: Ghrelin treatment prevented volume loss after TBI (19.4 ± 9.8 mm(3)versus 71.4 ± 31.4 mm(3); P < 0.05). Similarly, although TBI increased FJB-positive neuronal degeneration, ghrelin treatment decreased FJB staining in TBI resulting in immunohistologic patterns similar to sham. Compared with sham, TBI animals had a significant increase in foot faults at d 1, 3, and 7 (2.75 ± 0.42; 2.67 ± 0.94; 3.33 ± 0.69 versus 0.0 ± 0.0; 0.17 ± 0.19; 0.0 ± 0.0; P < 0.001). TBI + ghrelin animals had significantly decreased foot faults compared with TBI at d 1, 3, and 7 (0.42 ± 0.63; 0.5 ± 0.43; 1.33 ± 0.58; P versus TBI <0.001; P versus sham = NS).
CONCLUSIONS: Ghrelin treatment prevented post-TBI cortical volume loss and neurodegeneration. Furthermore, ghrelin improved post-TBI motor deficits. The mechanisms of these effects are unclear; however, a combination of the anti-apoptotic and inflammatory modulatory effects of ghrelin may play a role. Further studies delineating the mechanism of these observed effects are warranted.