Ghrelin decreases motor deficits after traumatic brain injury.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Pharmacologic therapy for traumatic brain injury (TBI) has remained relatively unchanged for decades. Ghrelin, an endogenously produced peptide, has been shown to prevent apoptosis and blood-brain barrier dysfunction after TBI. We hypothesize that ghrelin treatment will prevent neuronal degeneration and improve motor coordination after TBI.
MATERIALS AND
METHODS
A weight drop model created severe TBI in three groups of BALB/c mice: Sham, TBI, and TBI + ghrelin (20 μg intraperitoneal ghrelin). Brain tissue was examined by hematoxylin and eosin and Fluoro-Jade B (FJB) staining to evaluate histologic signs of injury, cortical volume loss, and neuronal degeneration. Additionally, motor coordination was assessed.
RESULTS
Ghrelin treatment prevented volume loss after TBI (19.4 ± 9.8 mm(3)versus 71.4 ± 31.4 mm(3); P < 0.05). Similarly, although TBI increased FJB-positive neuronal degeneration, ghrelin treatment decreased FJB staining in TBI resulting in immunohistologic patterns similar to sham. Compared with sham, TBI animals had a significant increase in foot faults at d 1, 3, and 7 (2.75 ± 0.42; 2.67 ± 0.94; 3.33 ± 0.69 versus 0.0 ± 0.0; 0.17 ± 0.19; 0.0 ± 0.0; P < 0.001). TBI + ghrelin animals had significantly decreased foot faults compared with TBI at d 1, 3, and 7 (0.42 ± 0.63; 0.5 ± 0.43; 1.33 ± 0.58; P versus TBI <0.001; P versus sham = NS).
CONCLUSIONS
Ghrelin treatment prevented post-TBI cortical volume loss and neurodegeneration. Furthermore, ghrelin improved post-TBI motor deficits. The mechanisms of these effects are unclear; however, a combination of the anti-apoptotic and inflammatory modulatory effects of ghrelin may play a role. Further studies delineating the mechanism of these observed effects are warranted.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.