Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists · 2014
Diagnostic value of peripheral fractional flow reserve in isolated iliac artery stenosis: a comparison with the post-exercise ankle-brachial index.
Сравнительное исследованиеОценочное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hioki Hirofumi, Miyashita Yusuke, Miura Takashi, Ebisawa Souichirou, Motoki Hirohiko, Izawa Atsushi, Tomita Takeshi, Koyama Jun, Ikeda Uichi
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To examine in claudicant patients with aortoiliac lesions the relationship between the post-exercise ankle-brachial index (ABI) and the peripheral fractional flow reserve (p-FFR), a physiological test that has heretofore been used to assess coronary and renal artery stenosis.
METHODS: Sixteen male patients (mean age 68.1±7.5 years) with isolated iliac artery lesions detected by ultrasound in 17 limbs were enrolled in this study. Resting ABI was measured and a treadmill test was administered to measure the post-exercise ABI. During angiography, the p-FFR was measured using a pressure guidewire after administration of papaverine to induce hyperemia. Changes in the ABI during exercise and p-FFR at hyperemia were calculated.
RESULTS: The mean resting ABI and post-exercise ABI were 0.87±0.12 and 0.65±0.24, respectively. There was no complication during the measurement of p-FFR. The mean p-FFR at hyperemia was 0.71±0.14. A significant linear correlation was observed between post-exercise ABI and p-FFR at hyperemia (r=0.857, p<0.001), which was stronger than the correlation between post-exercise ABI and peak-to-peak pressure gradient at hyperemia (r= -0.626, p=0.013).
CONCLUSIONS: Measuring p-FFR appears to be a feasible and safe procedure, and there is a significant linear correlation between post-exercise ABI and p-FFR in aortoiliac lesions. The p-FFR was more accurate than a peak-to-peak pressure gradient in assessing the physiological significance of a stenosis. Though larger studies are required, p-FFR might be used to physiologically assess stenosis in PAD patients with isolated aortoiliac lesions.
METHODS: Sixteen male patients (mean age 68.1±7.5 years) with isolated iliac artery lesions detected by ultrasound in 17 limbs were enrolled in this study. Resting ABI was measured and a treadmill test was administered to measure the post-exercise ABI. During angiography, the p-FFR was measured using a pressure guidewire after administration of papaverine to induce hyperemia. Changes in the ABI during exercise and p-FFR at hyperemia were calculated.
RESULTS: The mean resting ABI and post-exercise ABI were 0.87±0.12 and 0.65±0.24, respectively. There was no complication during the measurement of p-FFR. The mean p-FFR at hyperemia was 0.71±0.14. A significant linear correlation was observed between post-exercise ABI and p-FFR at hyperemia (r=0.857, p<0.001), which was stronger than the correlation between post-exercise ABI and peak-to-peak pressure gradient at hyperemia (r= -0.626, p=0.013).
CONCLUSIONS: Measuring p-FFR appears to be a feasible and safe procedure, and there is a significant linear correlation between post-exercise ABI and p-FFR in aortoiliac lesions. The p-FFR was more accurate than a peak-to-peak pressure gradient in assessing the physiological significance of a stenosis. Though larger studies are required, p-FFR might be used to physiologically assess stenosis in PAD patients with isolated aortoiliac lesions.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AgedAnkle Brachial IndexArterial PressureConstriction, PathologicExercise TestFeasibility StudiesHemodynamicsHumansHyperemiaIliac ArteryIntermittent ClaudicationLinear ModelsMaleMiddle AgedPapaverinePeripheral Arterial DiseasePredictive Value of TestsPrognosisRadiographyRegional Blood FlowSeverity of Illness IndexUltrasonographyVasodilator Agents