Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists · 2014
Five-year prognosis after endovascular therapy in claudicant patients with iliofemoral artery disease.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Miura Takashi, Soga Yoshimitsu, Miyashita Yusuke, Iida Osamu, Kawasaki Daizo, Hirano Keisuke, Suzuki Kenji, Ikeda Uichi
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To examine the prognosis of patients with intermittent claudication who received treatment with endovascular techniques.
METHODS: A retrospective multicenter study was performed involving 2930 consecutive patients (2307 men; mean age 71.5±8.9 years) with intermittent claudication who underwent an endovascular procedure for a de novo iliofemoral artery lesion. The primary outcome measure was overall survival. The secondary outcomes were freedom from major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: all-cause death, myocardial infarction, and stroke) and from major adverse cardiovascular and limb events (MACE with repeat revascularization or above-knee amputation of the target limb). Cox multivariate regression analysis of selected baseline characteristics, procedure-related complications, and medication use was performed to determine predictors for all-cause mortality. Positive predictors from this analysis were used to stratify patients into low- (1410, 48.1%), moderate- (1406, 48.0%), and high-risk (114, 3.9%) categories.
RESULTS: The overall survival rates were 97.2%, 90.8%, and 83.4% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. The cause of death was cardiovascular in 42.8% of cases. Freedom from MACE was 96.7%, 88.6%, and 77.3% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. Cox multivariate regression analysis identified age, dialysis, left ventricular dysfunction, insulin-dependent diabetes, hematoma prolonging hospitalization, coronary artery disease, and superficial femoral plus iliac lesions as positive predictors of all-cause mortality. In the risk stratification analysis, the overall 5-year survival rate was significantly lower in high-risk patients compared to the other groups (90.1% vs. 78.6% vs. 53.5%, p<0.0001).
CONCLUSION: The prognosis in patients with intermittent claudication after endovascular therapy was relatively good but extremely poor for the high-risk patient subgroup.
METHODS: A retrospective multicenter study was performed involving 2930 consecutive patients (2307 men; mean age 71.5±8.9 years) with intermittent claudication who underwent an endovascular procedure for a de novo iliofemoral artery lesion. The primary outcome measure was overall survival. The secondary outcomes were freedom from major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: all-cause death, myocardial infarction, and stroke) and from major adverse cardiovascular and limb events (MACE with repeat revascularization or above-knee amputation of the target limb). Cox multivariate regression analysis of selected baseline characteristics, procedure-related complications, and medication use was performed to determine predictors for all-cause mortality. Positive predictors from this analysis were used to stratify patients into low- (1410, 48.1%), moderate- (1406, 48.0%), and high-risk (114, 3.9%) categories.
RESULTS: The overall survival rates were 97.2%, 90.8%, and 83.4% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. The cause of death was cardiovascular in 42.8% of cases. Freedom from MACE was 96.7%, 88.6%, and 77.3% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. Cox multivariate regression analysis identified age, dialysis, left ventricular dysfunction, insulin-dependent diabetes, hematoma prolonging hospitalization, coronary artery disease, and superficial femoral plus iliac lesions as positive predictors of all-cause mortality. In the risk stratification analysis, the overall 5-year survival rate was significantly lower in high-risk patients compared to the other groups (90.1% vs. 78.6% vs. 53.5%, p<0.0001).
CONCLUSION: The prognosis in patients with intermittent claudication after endovascular therapy was relatively good but extremely poor for the high-risk patient subgroup.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AgedAged, 80 and overAngioplasty, BalloonConstriction, PathologicDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleFemoral ArteryHumansIliac ArteryIntermittent ClaudicationJapanKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisPeripheral Arterial DiseaseProportional Hazards ModelsRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsStentsTime FactorsTreatment Outcome