Foot (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2018
The relationship of the endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) gene polymorphism in Turkish type 2 diabetic patients with and without diabetic foot ulcers.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Erdogan Mehmet, Kulaksizoglu Mustafa, Tetik Asli, Solmaz Soner, Kucukaslan Ali Sahin, Eroglu Zuhal
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the influence of eNOS G894T and VEGF C936T gene polymorphism in diabetic foot ulcers.
METHOD: We studied 50 patients with diabetic foot ulcers and 57 diabetic patients without diabetic foot ulcer and a control group of 75 healthy individuals.
RESULTS: The genotype eNOS distribution did not differ between Type 2 Diabetic Patients group and Diabetic Foot Ulcer group (P>0.05). The frequency of the polymorphic T allele in Type 2 Diabetic Patients were significantly higher than the control group (42.3% and 24.5%, respectively)(p<0.01). The frequency of the polymorphic T allele between the Type 2 Diabetic Patients and Diabetic Foot Ulcer group was similar (p>0.05). The genotype VEGF distribution did not differ between Type 2 Diabetic Patients group and Diabetic Foot Ulcer group (P>0.05). The frequency of the polymorphic T allele between the Type 2 Diabetic Patients and Diabetic Foot Ulcer group was similar for both groups (p>0.05).
CONCLUSION: Polymorphism of eNOS G894T is not a risk factor for diabetic foot ulcer formation. T allele is a risk factor for diabetes, but T allele is not a risk factor for diabetic foot ulcer formation. Polymorphism of VEGF C936T and T allele are not risk factors for diabetes occurence and diabetic foot formation.
METHOD: We studied 50 patients with diabetic foot ulcers and 57 diabetic patients without diabetic foot ulcer and a control group of 75 healthy individuals.
RESULTS: The genotype eNOS distribution did not differ between Type 2 Diabetic Patients group and Diabetic Foot Ulcer group (P>0.05). The frequency of the polymorphic T allele in Type 2 Diabetic Patients were significantly higher than the control group (42.3% and 24.5%, respectively)(p<0.01). The frequency of the polymorphic T allele between the Type 2 Diabetic Patients and Diabetic Foot Ulcer group was similar (p>0.05). The genotype VEGF distribution did not differ between Type 2 Diabetic Patients group and Diabetic Foot Ulcer group (P>0.05). The frequency of the polymorphic T allele between the Type 2 Diabetic Patients and Diabetic Foot Ulcer group was similar for both groups (p>0.05).
CONCLUSION: Polymorphism of eNOS G894T is not a risk factor for diabetic foot ulcer formation. T allele is a risk factor for diabetes, but T allele is not a risk factor for diabetic foot ulcer formation. Polymorphism of VEGF C936T and T allele are not risk factors for diabetes occurence and diabetic foot formation.