MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s12664-013-0439-6

Медицинская библиотека · Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2014

Is empiric therapy with fluconazole appropriate for esophageal candidiasis?

Sajith Kattiparambil Gangadharan, Dutta Amit Kumar, Sahni Rani Diana, Esakimuthu Saritha, Chacko Ashok

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

We studied the prevalence of fluconazole resistance in esophageal candidiasis. Patients with suspected esophageal candidiasis during gastroscopy underwent culture of white plaques. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) >64 μg/mL of fluconazole for Candida was indicative of resistance. Sensitivity of itraconazole was tested in a subset of resistant strains. Sixty-five patients were included. Mean (SD) age was 50.03 (13.5) years and 67.7 % were males. Predisposing factors for candidiasis were found in 42 (64.6 %) patients. C. albicans was identified in 64 (97.4 %) patients and C. glabrata in one patient. Fluconazole resistance was seen in 38 (59.4 %) patients with C. albicans and also in the one patient with C. glabrata. All the fluconazole resistant isolates of C. albicans had MIC >128 μg/mL suggesting very high resistance. Twelve patients with fluconazole resistance had itraconazole resistance as well. The study shows a high rate of fluconazole resistance in patients with esophageal candidiasis.

Для цитирования: Sajith Kattiparambil Gangadharan, Dutta Amit Kumar, Sahni Rani Diana, Esakimuthu Saritha, Chacko Ashok. Is empiric therapy with fluconazole appropriate for esophageal candidiasis?. Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology. 2014. DOI: 10.1007/s12664-013-0439-6.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.