Journal of evidence-based medicine · 2018
Quality assessment of diabetic foot ulcer clinical practice guidelines.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ghanbari Atefeh, Rahmatpour Pardis, Jafaraghaee Fateme, Kazemnejad Ehsan, Khalili Malahat
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Nurses play an effective role in diabetic foot care and they should know the best evidence. In this way, implementations according evidence-based clinical practice guidelines have positive effects on nurses' practice and patient outcomes. The objective of this study was quality assessment of diabetic foot ulcer clinical practice guidelines.
METHODS: Evidence about nursing care in diabetic foot ulcer in last 5 years was searched and categorized based on nursing diagnosis (ND) and evidence levels and was finally designed as a guideline. Quality appraisal of guideline was evaluated with AGREEII tool by an expert panel. AGREEII consists of 23 items, grouped in six domains: scope and purpose, stakeholder involvement, rigor of development, clarity of presentation, applicability, and editorial independence. Applicability of the guideline in clinical was assessed with a checklist by the nursing group. Data analysis was carried out with SPSS v.18 (descriptive statistics and binomial test).
RESULTS: Of the 114 studies, evidence of 19 studies was selected. The guidelines had three parts: introduction, nursing recommendation, and appendix. Evidence was categorized according to 8 NDs. According to AGREEII, the guideline had the highest score in the "scope and purpose" (92.7%) and the lowest in "applicability" (76.2%) domains. Also, nurses reported the positive effect of implementation of guideline recommendations and lack of needed equipment for its implementation.
CONCLUSIONS: Guidelines received acceptable scores in all the domains of AGREEII. Based on nurses' opinion, recommendations of guidelines will play an effective role in prevention, treatment, reduction of complication among diabetic foot patients. Therefore, adaptation, implementation, and evaluation of the guidelines were recommended.
METHODS: Evidence about nursing care in diabetic foot ulcer in last 5 years was searched and categorized based on nursing diagnosis (ND) and evidence levels and was finally designed as a guideline. Quality appraisal of guideline was evaluated with AGREEII tool by an expert panel. AGREEII consists of 23 items, grouped in six domains: scope and purpose, stakeholder involvement, rigor of development, clarity of presentation, applicability, and editorial independence. Applicability of the guideline in clinical was assessed with a checklist by the nursing group. Data analysis was carried out with SPSS v.18 (descriptive statistics and binomial test).
RESULTS: Of the 114 studies, evidence of 19 studies was selected. The guidelines had three parts: introduction, nursing recommendation, and appendix. Evidence was categorized according to 8 NDs. According to AGREEII, the guideline had the highest score in the "scope and purpose" (92.7%) and the lowest in "applicability" (76.2%) domains. Also, nurses reported the positive effect of implementation of guideline recommendations and lack of needed equipment for its implementation.
CONCLUSIONS: Guidelines received acceptable scores in all the domains of AGREEII. Based on nurses' opinion, recommendations of guidelines will play an effective role in prevention, treatment, reduction of complication among diabetic foot patients. Therefore, adaptation, implementation, and evaluation of the guidelines were recommended.