Head & neck · 2024
The Submental Artery Island Flap for Reconstruction of Acquired Maxillary and Palatal Defects After Tumor Ablation: Reversed Flow Versus the Extended Antegrade Design.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Amin Ayman A, Jamali Omer M, Farid Ramez, Zedan Mohamed H, Ghobrial Romany Esshak, Zakka Reem, Rifaat Mohammed A
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The submental artery island flap (SIF) is a valid option for palatal reconstruction. However, the main limitation for its application for palatal defects is the arc of rotation. A novel modification for tunneling of the antegrade design of SIF that allows a compliant easy reach to the defect is described.
METHODS: Eighteen patients with Brown class II maxillectomy defects were included. Reconstruction started using reversed flow SIF in five patients then shifted to the modified antegrade technique in the remaining patients. Speech, swallowing, chewing, other parameters, and oncological outcomes were assessed.
RESULTS: The reversed flow group has high complications. In the antegrade SIF group, all flaps survived. One developed marginal flap necrosis that healed spontaneously. The follow-up period ranged from 1 to 4.2 years with favorable functional outcome and with no evidence of recurrence.
CONCLUSION: The modified SIF antegrade design is a reliable option for palate reconstruction that allows favorable functional and oncological outcome.
METHODS: Eighteen patients with Brown class II maxillectomy defects were included. Reconstruction started using reversed flow SIF in five patients then shifted to the modified antegrade technique in the remaining patients. Speech, swallowing, chewing, other parameters, and oncological outcomes were assessed.
RESULTS: The reversed flow group has high complications. In the antegrade SIF group, all flaps survived. One developed marginal flap necrosis that healed spontaneously. The follow-up period ranged from 1 to 4.2 years with favorable functional outcome and with no evidence of recurrence.
CONCLUSION: The modified SIF antegrade design is a reliable option for palate reconstruction that allows favorable functional and oncological outcome.