Journal of affective disorders · 2022
The effect of adjunctive infliximab treatment on future cardiovascular disease risk in patients with bipolar disorder.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Gill Hartej, Rodrigues Nelson B, Mansur Rodrigo B, Marks CéAnn A, DiVincenzo Joshua D, Ceban Felicia, Rosenblat Joshua D, Cao Bing, Lieberman Jonathan M, Ho Roger, McIntyre Roger S
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Bipolar disorder (BD) is characterized by a pro-inflammatory biotype, and is a major cause of cardiovascular disease (CVD), consequently causing elevated rates of morbidity and mortality among individuals with BD.
METHODS: The present study is based on a 12-week clinical trial assessing the antidepressant effects of adjunctive infliximab treatment in BD. Generalized estimating equation (GEE) models were used to evaluate CVD risk in people with BD following adjunctive infliximab treatment at baseline and week 12. Participants (baseline: n = 40; endpoint: 33) were randomized for an infliximab-treatment or placebo group. CVD-risk was calculated using Framingham risk scores (FRS), mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) and total cholesterol (TC).
RESULTS: There was no main effect of treatment on FRS in infliximab-treated participants compared to controls (p = 0.408). Similarly, there were no significant differences in MAP between the infliximab-treated and control group (p = 0.796). The effect of treatment on TC was not significant (p = 0.130), however, an evaluation across time suggested the main effect of the group was significant at week 0 (p = 0.01), but not week 12 (p = 0.219).
LIMITATIONS: Cardiovascular disease was not an outcome of the original clinical trial, and our participant group did not have a high CVD-risk at baseline.
CONCLUSION: There were no significant treatment effects of infliximab on FRS, MAP and TC. The current study highlights the complexity of immune-system targets that influence CVD in psychiatric populations. Future studies should include a large scale, combinatorial omnibus biomarker approach to evaluate the immune and vascular link in BD.
METHODS: The present study is based on a 12-week clinical trial assessing the antidepressant effects of adjunctive infliximab treatment in BD. Generalized estimating equation (GEE) models were used to evaluate CVD risk in people with BD following adjunctive infliximab treatment at baseline and week 12. Participants (baseline: n = 40; endpoint: 33) were randomized for an infliximab-treatment or placebo group. CVD-risk was calculated using Framingham risk scores (FRS), mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) and total cholesterol (TC).
RESULTS: There was no main effect of treatment on FRS in infliximab-treated participants compared to controls (p = 0.408). Similarly, there were no significant differences in MAP between the infliximab-treated and control group (p = 0.796). The effect of treatment on TC was not significant (p = 0.130), however, an evaluation across time suggested the main effect of the group was significant at week 0 (p = 0.01), but not week 12 (p = 0.219).
LIMITATIONS: Cardiovascular disease was not an outcome of the original clinical trial, and our participant group did not have a high CVD-risk at baseline.
CONCLUSION: There were no significant treatment effects of infliximab on FRS, MAP and TC. The current study highlights the complexity of immune-system targets that influence CVD in psychiatric populations. Future studies should include a large scale, combinatorial omnibus biomarker approach to evaluate the immune and vascular link in BD.