Mycoses · 2020
The utility of the basophil activation test in differentiating asthmatic subjects with and without allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis.
СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Prasad Kuruswamy Thurai, Muthu Valliappan, Sehgal Inderpaul Singh, Dhooria Sahajal, Singh Pawan, Sachdeva Man Updesh Singh, Chakrabarti Arunaloke, Aggarwal Ashutosh N, Agarwal Ritesh
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Asthma with Aspergillus sensitisation (ASA) and allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) are distinct clinical conditions, with different management strategies.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the utility of the basophil activation test (BAT) in differentiating between asthmatic subjects with and without ABPA.
METHODS: We performed the BAT using flow cytometry for the basophil activation markers CD63, CD193, and CD203c in consecutive subjects with unsensitised asthma (UA), ASA and ABPA. The BAT was performed unstimulated (baseline) and after stimulation with peanut and Aspergillus fumigatus antigens. Stimulation indices (SI) for CD63, CD193 and CD203c were compared between the study groups.
RESULTS: We enrolled 82 (UA [n = 25], ASA [n = 25], ABPA [n = 32]) subjects. Only those subjects without peanut sensitisation on serological testing were included in further analyses (n = 50). The receiver operating characteristic analysis of SI for CD63, CD193 and CD203c for the diagnosis of ABPA vs other asthmatics (UA and ASA) showed an area under the curve of 0.577, 0.317 and 0.625, respectively. The SI CD203c at a cut-off of 1.2 (sensitivity 50.0%, specificity 88.9%) and the SI CD63 at a cut-off of 1.3 (sensitivity 42.9%, specificity 91.7%) also had limited utility for the diagnosis of ABPA.
CONCLUSION: The BAT cannot be used as a diagnostic test in distinguishing ABPA complicating asthma from ASA and UA.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the utility of the basophil activation test (BAT) in differentiating between asthmatic subjects with and without ABPA.
METHODS: We performed the BAT using flow cytometry for the basophil activation markers CD63, CD193, and CD203c in consecutive subjects with unsensitised asthma (UA), ASA and ABPA. The BAT was performed unstimulated (baseline) and after stimulation with peanut and Aspergillus fumigatus antigens. Stimulation indices (SI) for CD63, CD193 and CD203c were compared between the study groups.
RESULTS: We enrolled 82 (UA [n = 25], ASA [n = 25], ABPA [n = 32]) subjects. Only those subjects without peanut sensitisation on serological testing were included in further analyses (n = 50). The receiver operating characteristic analysis of SI for CD63, CD193 and CD203c for the diagnosis of ABPA vs other asthmatics (UA and ASA) showed an area under the curve of 0.577, 0.317 and 0.625, respectively. The SI CD203c at a cut-off of 1.2 (sensitivity 50.0%, specificity 88.9%) and the SI CD63 at a cut-off of 1.3 (sensitivity 42.9%, specificity 91.7%) also had limited utility for the diagnosis of ABPA.
CONCLUSION: The BAT cannot be used as a diagnostic test in distinguishing ABPA complicating asthma from ASA and UA.