Hepatology communications · 2022
Improved prognosis of hepatitis C-related hepatocellular carcinoma in the era of direct-acting antivirals.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Fukumoto Tsuyoshi, Minami Tatsuya, Moriyama Makoto, Yamada Tomoharu, Wake Taijiro, Kinoshita Mizuki Nishibatake, Fujiwara Naoto, Nakagomi Ryo, Nakatsuka Takuma, Sato Masaya, Enooku Kenichiro, Nakagawa Hayato, Fujishiro Mitsuhiro, Shiina Shuichiro, Koike Kazuhiko, Tateishi Ryosuke
Аннотация
The prognostic impact of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) on patients with hepatitis C-related hepatocellular carcinoma (C-HCC) is still unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the prognosis of C-HCC in the DAA era. We enrolled 1237 consecutive patients with treatment-naive C-HCC who underwent radical radiofrequency ablation between 1999 and 2019. We also enrolled 350 patients with nonviral HCC as controls. We divided these patients into three groups according to the year of initial treatment: 1999-2005 (cohort 1), 2006-2013 (cohort 2), and 2014-2019 (cohort 3). The use of antiviral agents and their effect in patients with C-HCC was investigated. Overall survival was evaluated for each cohort using the Kaplan-Meier method and a multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression model. Sustained virologic response (SVR) was achieved in 52 (10%), 157 (26%), and 102 (74%) patients with C-HCC in cohorts 1-3, respectively. The 3- and 5-year survival rates of patients with C-HCC were 82% and 59% in cohort 1; 80% and 64% in cohort 2; and 86% and 78% in cohort 3, respectively (p = 0.003). Multivariable analysis adjusted for age, liver function, and tumor extension showed that the prognosis of C-HCC improved in cohort 3 compared to cohort 1 (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.32-0.73; p < 0.001), whereas the prognosis of nonviral HCC did not improve significantly (aHR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.59-1.57; p = 0.88). The prognosis of C-HCC drastically improved with the advent of DAAs.