Blood purification · 2011
Secondary hyperparathyroidism in chronic dialysis patients: results of the Italian FARO survey on treatment and mortality.
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Brancaccio Diego, Cozzolino Mario, Cannella Giuseppe, Messa Piergiorgio, Bonomini Mario, Cancarini Giovanni, Caruso Maria Rosa, Cascone Carmelo, Costanzo Anna Maria, di Luzio Paparatti Umberto, Mazzaferro Sandro, FARO Study Group
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Vitamin D receptor activator (VDRA) therapy has been shown to be associated with reduced mortality rates in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT). However, differences between VDRAs in their ability to reduce both all-cause and cardiovascular-related mortality rates are not yet fully elucidated.
METHODS: The objective of the current analysis was to determine the effect of VDRA therapy on mortality in an Italian dialysis population, observed prospectively every 6 months for 18 months. Patients were investigated for all-cause and cardiovascular-related mortality risk adjusted for various demographic, clinical, and/or SHPT treatment variables.
RESULTS: The cumulative probabilities of all-cause and cardiovascular-related mortality were lower for patients who received any VDRA treatment compared with those who did not (p < 0.001) regardless of all measured variables. Additionally, patients who received paricalcitol and/or cinacalcet (with or without VDRAs) compared with calcitriol showed a significant improvement in both all-cause and cardiovascular-related mortality (p < 0.001). Cinacalcet with or without VDRAs was not associated with a further decrease of mortality hazard ratios compared with paricalcitol monotherapy.
CONCLUSIONS: VDRA therapy (associated or not with cinacalcet) was associated with improved survival in dialysis patients, independent of demographic and clinical variables.
METHODS: The objective of the current analysis was to determine the effect of VDRA therapy on mortality in an Italian dialysis population, observed prospectively every 6 months for 18 months. Patients were investigated for all-cause and cardiovascular-related mortality risk adjusted for various demographic, clinical, and/or SHPT treatment variables.
RESULTS: The cumulative probabilities of all-cause and cardiovascular-related mortality were lower for patients who received any VDRA treatment compared with those who did not (p < 0.001) regardless of all measured variables. Additionally, patients who received paricalcitol and/or cinacalcet (with or without VDRAs) compared with calcitriol showed a significant improvement in both all-cause and cardiovascular-related mortality (p < 0.001). Cinacalcet with or without VDRAs was not associated with a further decrease of mortality hazard ratios compared with paricalcitol monotherapy.
CONCLUSIONS: VDRA therapy (associated or not with cinacalcet) was associated with improved survival in dialysis patients, independent of demographic and clinical variables.