DOI 10.1016/j.wneu.2010.10.048
Selective propofol injection into the M1 segment of the middle cerebral artery (MCA Wada test) reduces adverse effects and enhances the reliability of the Wada test for determining speech dominance.
Аннотация
OBJECT: The Wada test is had been the most reliable for determining speech dominance. Drugs injected into the internal carotid artery, however, may be heterogeneously distributed as the result of asymmetry of the anterior cerebral arteries and the presence of a fetal-type posterior cerebral artery. Variations in drug distribution could occasionally alter consciousness and complicate the evaluation of the test results. We examined selective propofol injection into the M1 segment of the middle cerebral artery (MCA Wada test).
METHODS
For the MCA Wada test (17 patients), 7 or 8 mg of propofol was injected via a microcatheter navigated into the M1 segment, and language function was evaluated by patient performing several tasks. The conventional Wada test (internal carotid artery [ICA] Wada test) was performed in four patients (both the ICA and MCA Wada tests were performed in one patient). The efficacy and adverse effects of both procedures were evaluated; all tests were performed by well-trained interventional neuroradiologists.
RESULTS
Immediately after propofol injection during the MCA Wada test, patients developed transient contralateral hemiplegia and transient aphasia (in the case of injection on the dominant side). Confusion and other severe adverse effects did not occur during the MCA Wada test, but two of four patients who underwent the ICA Wada test showed altered consciousness that affected the performance of the test.
CONCLUSIONS
The MCA Wada test is a feasible and reliable preoperative evaluation, if performed by a trained team of interventional neuroradiologists.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.