Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie · 2009
[The impact of a verbal consent form on the participation rate in a telephone survey].
Сравнительное исследованиеАннотация на английскомСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Jacques Christian, Ladouceur Robert, Fournier Patricia-Maude, Baillargeon Lucie
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of a consent form on the participation rate in a telephone survey about gambling and money.
METHOD: Four different consent forms were tested. The first consent form globally met the academic ethics committee requirements, while the second and third forms excluded some elements. Finally, the fourth form was similar to the introduction generally used by private survey firms.
RESULTS: Even when the consent form required by academic ethics committees was shortened, the private firm introduction led to the best participation rate. However, participants who received the private firm introduction indicated that they wished they had been better informed before the interview started.
CONCLUSION: The discussion highlights the delicate situation of academic research wishing to meet ethics requirements as well as conduct valid and representative research.
METHOD: Four different consent forms were tested. The first consent form globally met the academic ethics committee requirements, while the second and third forms excluded some elements. Finally, the fourth form was similar to the introduction generally used by private survey firms.
RESULTS: Even when the consent form required by academic ethics committees was shortened, the private firm introduction led to the best participation rate. However, participants who received the private firm introduction indicated that they wished they had been better informed before the interview started.
CONCLUSION: The discussion highlights the delicate situation of academic research wishing to meet ethics requirements as well as conduct valid and representative research.