BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2020
In Search of Predictors of Switching Between Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents in Clinical Practice: A Multi-Regional Cohort Study.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНаблюдательное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ingrasciotta Ylenia, Belleudi Valeria, Trotta Francesco, Addis Antonio, Fontana Andrea, Chinellato Alessandro, Ientile Valentina, Tari Daniele Ugo, Roberto Giuseppe, Pastorello Maurizio, Scondotto Salvatore, Cananzi Pasquale, Traversa Giuseppe, Davoli Marina, Rossi Mariangela, Trifirò Gianluca, Italian Biosimilars Network (I-BioNetwork)
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Switching between different erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) during the first year of therapy is frequent (15-20%), much more so toward reference products than biosimilars. The objectives of this study were to investigate the frequency and identify the potential predictors of switching between biosimilar and originator ESAs during the first year of treatment in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), or chemotherapy-related anemia from six large Italian geographic areas in the years 2009-2015.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using six Italian regional claims databases (≥ 13 million inhabitants) during 2009-2015. Among incident epoetin users, the frequency of single, multiple, and backward switch during the first year of treatment was evaluated. Using frailty Cox models, potential predictors of first switch were identified. All analyses were stratified by the main indications for use.
RESULTS: Among 102,240 incident epoetin users, 15,853 (15.5%) switched to another epoetin during the first year of therapy; only 18% of these switched to biosimilars. Single switch was more common (62.2% of the switchers) than multiple (23.5%) or backward switch (14.3%). In cancer, the cumulative number of transfusions and iron preparations dispensed, as well as hyperparathyroidism, were predictors of switching. In CKD, the cumulative number of transfusions, number of vitamin A/D preparations dispensed, and CKD severity increased the probability of switching.
CONCLUSIONS: Switching between ESAs was frequent in both CKD and cancer patients. The number of cumulative transfusions and severity of disease seemed to affect the switch.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using six Italian regional claims databases (≥ 13 million inhabitants) during 2009-2015. Among incident epoetin users, the frequency of single, multiple, and backward switch during the first year of treatment was evaluated. Using frailty Cox models, potential predictors of first switch were identified. All analyses were stratified by the main indications for use.
RESULTS: Among 102,240 incident epoetin users, 15,853 (15.5%) switched to another epoetin during the first year of therapy; only 18% of these switched to biosimilars. Single switch was more common (62.2% of the switchers) than multiple (23.5%) or backward switch (14.3%). In cancer, the cumulative number of transfusions and iron preparations dispensed, as well as hyperparathyroidism, were predictors of switching. In CKD, the cumulative number of transfusions, number of vitamin A/D preparations dispensed, and CKD severity increased the probability of switching.
CONCLUSIONS: Switching between ESAs was frequent in both CKD and cancer patients. The number of cumulative transfusions and severity of disease seemed to affect the switch.