The European journal of surgery = Acta chirurgica · 1996
Functional results after abdominal suture rectopexy for rectal prolapse or intussusception.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Graf W, Karlbom U, Påhlman L, Nilsson S, Ejerblad S
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To assess the functional outcome after suture rectopexy in patients with rectal prolapse or intussusception.
DESIGN: Retrospective study.
SETTING: University hospital, Sweden.
SUBJECTS: 33 patients with rectal prolapse and 19 patients with intussusception treated by abdominal suture rectopexy 1969-1992.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Bowel function evaluated by a questionnaire a median of 97 months after operation.
RESULTS: 10/33 patients (30%) reported less constipation after rectopexy in the prolapse group compared with 3/19 (16%) in the intussusception group (p = 0.33). Rectal emptying improved in 14/33 (42%) and 1/19 (5%), respectively (p = 0.005), and incontinence in 12/33 (36%) and 3/19 (16%), respectively (p = 0.20). Seventeen patients (52%) with prolapse and 3 (16%) with intussusception described the result of operation as excellent or good (p = 0.02).
CONCLUSION: There is a reasonable chance of improved rectal emptying and continence in patients undergoing suture rectopexy for rectal prolapse, whereas bowel symptoms commonly worsen postoperatively in patients treated for intussusception.
DESIGN: Retrospective study.
SETTING: University hospital, Sweden.
SUBJECTS: 33 patients with rectal prolapse and 19 patients with intussusception treated by abdominal suture rectopexy 1969-1992.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Bowel function evaluated by a questionnaire a median of 97 months after operation.
RESULTS: 10/33 patients (30%) reported less constipation after rectopexy in the prolapse group compared with 3/19 (16%) in the intussusception group (p = 0.33). Rectal emptying improved in 14/33 (42%) and 1/19 (5%), respectively (p = 0.005), and incontinence in 12/33 (36%) and 3/19 (16%), respectively (p = 0.20). Seventeen patients (52%) with prolapse and 3 (16%) with intussusception described the result of operation as excellent or good (p = 0.02).
CONCLUSION: There is a reasonable chance of improved rectal emptying and continence in patients undergoing suture rectopexy for rectal prolapse, whereas bowel symptoms commonly worsen postoperatively in patients treated for intussusception.