Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2006
Condensation and validation of a 4-item index of the Acne-QoL.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАВалидационное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tan Jerry, Fung Karen Y, Khan Shahedul
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The 19-item Acne-QoL is a validated psychometric instrument designed for use in clinical trials.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to develop a condensed version of the Acne-QoL as an alternative measure of psychosocial impact for use in routine clinical practice.
METHODS: Four condensed versions of the Acne-QoL were evaluated by regression analysis in a subset of 434 patients. The version with four items most broadly representative of acne-specific quality of life combined with a high level of correlation to Acne-QoL total score was selected for further validation in two different patient samples.
RESULTS: The patient ranked condensation, representing items from each domain of greatest patient-perceived importance and relevance was selected for further analysis (Acne-Q(4)). The Acne-Q(4) explained 98.5% of the variation in total score of Acne-QoL. Validation of the Acne-Q(4) in a follow-up group and an independent subset of patients resulted in Pearson correlation coefficients of 0.967 (p<0.001). Construct validity of the Acne-Q(4) was confirmed by demonstrating a similar relationship as the Acne-QoL to acne severity.
LIMITATIONS: There is less breadth and detail of QoL information in the Acne-Q(4) than in the Acne-QoL. The analysis relied on a total score for Acne-QoL, which the original developers did not validate.
CONCLUSIONS: The Acne-Q(4) is accurately reflective of the parent instrument and may facilitate the psychometric evaluation of the impact of facial acne on patients in routine clinical practice by its practicality.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to develop a condensed version of the Acne-QoL as an alternative measure of psychosocial impact for use in routine clinical practice.
METHODS: Four condensed versions of the Acne-QoL were evaluated by regression analysis in a subset of 434 patients. The version with four items most broadly representative of acne-specific quality of life combined with a high level of correlation to Acne-QoL total score was selected for further validation in two different patient samples.
RESULTS: The patient ranked condensation, representing items from each domain of greatest patient-perceived importance and relevance was selected for further analysis (Acne-Q(4)). The Acne-Q(4) explained 98.5% of the variation in total score of Acne-QoL. Validation of the Acne-Q(4) in a follow-up group and an independent subset of patients resulted in Pearson correlation coefficients of 0.967 (p<0.001). Construct validity of the Acne-Q(4) was confirmed by demonstrating a similar relationship as the Acne-QoL to acne severity.
LIMITATIONS: There is less breadth and detail of QoL information in the Acne-Q(4) than in the Acne-QoL. The analysis relied on a total score for Acne-QoL, which the original developers did not validate.
CONCLUSIONS: The Acne-Q(4) is accurately reflective of the parent instrument and may facilitate the psychometric evaluation of the impact of facial acne on patients in routine clinical practice by its practicality.