International journal of paediatric dentistry · 2025
Effectiveness of a 4-Month vs. 8-Month Recall Interval for High-Caries-Risk Preschool Children: A 30-Month Clinical Trial.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Cordeschi Thais, Besseler Mariana, Olegário Isabel Cristina, Ekstrand Kim, Bakhshandeh Azam, Berti Gabriela, Abanto Jenny, Bönecker Marcelo
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Regular follow-up after dental treatment is essential to prevent the development and progression of new caries lesions in children. However, there is no consensus on the optimal recall interval.
AIM: The aim of the present clinical trial was to evaluate the effectiveness of two different recall intervals for high caries risk children.
DESIGN: A total of 224 preschool children (aged 3-5 years) with at least one active caries lesion were selected. After treatment, children were randomized into two different groups according to the recall interval: every 4 months or every 8 months. A single trained and calibrated examiner re-evaluated participants according to their group. The primary outcome was caries lesion progression into dentine (ICDAS 5-6). Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the association between the independent variables and primary outcome (α = 5%).
RESULTS: Children in the 8-month recall group were 2.5 times more likely to develop new cavitated caries lesions when compared to those in the 4-month recall group, over 30 months.
CONCLUSION: High caries risk children on an 8-month recall schedule had a significantly higher risk of developing new cavitated caries lesions compared to those with a 4-month recall interval.
AIM: The aim of the present clinical trial was to evaluate the effectiveness of two different recall intervals for high caries risk children.
DESIGN: A total of 224 preschool children (aged 3-5 years) with at least one active caries lesion were selected. After treatment, children were randomized into two different groups according to the recall interval: every 4 months or every 8 months. A single trained and calibrated examiner re-evaluated participants according to their group. The primary outcome was caries lesion progression into dentine (ICDAS 5-6). Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the association between the independent variables and primary outcome (α = 5%).
RESULTS: Children in the 8-month recall group were 2.5 times more likely to develop new cavitated caries lesions when compared to those in the 4-month recall group, over 30 months.
CONCLUSION: High caries risk children on an 8-month recall schedule had a significantly higher risk of developing new cavitated caries lesions compared to those with a 4-month recall interval.