MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1155/2013/497585

Медицинская библиотека · Gastroenterology research and practice · 2013

The prevalence of functional gastrointestinal disorders in the chinese air force population.

Wu Wenming, Guo Xu, Yang Yunsheng, Peng Lihua, Mao Gaoping, Qurratulain Hyder, Wang Weifeng, Sun Gang

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Background. Functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs) are common in the general population worldwide. However, there is paucity of large sale surveys for prevalence of FGID in the military personnel. Methods. It is a cross-sectional study, using Rome III criteria for the diagnosis of FGID among the Chinese Air Force (CAF) workers. Results. Of 4633 registered male subjects, there were 818 (16.4%) air crew and 4170 (83.6%) ground personnel. FGIDs were identified in 1088 (23.48%) of cases. It was more prevalent in the ground personnel than air crew (24.02% versus 20.33%; P = 0.022). Based on Rome III criteria, the commonest disease category was functional gastroduodenal disorder (37.4%), whereas functional nausea and vomiting disorder (FNV) was the most frequent overall diagnosis. Functional dyspepsia (FD) with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) was the leading FGIDs' overlap (3.9%). Conclusion. FGIDs in CAF population are rather underestimated. This necessitates preventive strategies according to job characteristics.

Для цитирования: Wu Wenming, Guo Xu, Yang Yunsheng, Peng Lihua, Mao Gaoping, Qurratulain Hyder, Wang Weifeng, Sun Gang. The prevalence of functional gastrointestinal disorders in the chinese air force population.. Gastroenterology research and practice. 2013. DOI: 10.1155/2013/497585.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.