Neurogastroenterology and motility · 2012
Visceral and somatic sensory function in functional dyspepsia.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Li X, Cao Y, Wong R K M, Ho K Y, Wilder-Smith C H
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Visceral hypersensitivity is one of the proposed underlying mechanisms in functional dyspepsia (FD). It is not clear whether visceral hypersensitivity in FD is a manifestation of a central sensitization also encompassing somatic sensitization. Transient receptor potential vanilloid-1 (TRPV(1)) pathways are involved in gastric mechanosensory physiology and the TRPV(1) receptor agonist, capsaicin, has been used as a chemical stimulant.
METHODS: In this double-blind, randomized study we evaluated both visceral and somatic sensory function in 34 FD patients and 42 healthy controls using quantitative sensory testing. Visceral pain sensitivity was assessed using a validated gastric pain model with oral capsaicin capsule titration and somatic pain sensitivity was determined by foot heat and hand electric stimulation.
KEY RESULTS: The median capsaicin dose required to attain moderate pain was 0.5mg in FD and 1mg in controls (P = 0.03). At these doses, mean pain intensities on a 0-100 visual analog scale were greater for FD than controls [56.9 (95% confidence intervals, 52.2-61.5) vs 45.1 (41.6-48.6), resp.] (P = 0.005). Overall, mean somatic sensory and pain thresholds were similar in FD and control groups, but in a subgroup of FD pain hypersensitivity was seen on the hand and on the foot at different stimulation thresholds.
CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: A majority of patients with FD have visceral chemo-hypersensitivity involving TRPV(1) pathways. A substantial subgroup also has somatic hypersensitivity as evidence of central sensitization.
METHODS: In this double-blind, randomized study we evaluated both visceral and somatic sensory function in 34 FD patients and 42 healthy controls using quantitative sensory testing. Visceral pain sensitivity was assessed using a validated gastric pain model with oral capsaicin capsule titration and somatic pain sensitivity was determined by foot heat and hand electric stimulation.
KEY RESULTS: The median capsaicin dose required to attain moderate pain was 0.5mg in FD and 1mg in controls (P = 0.03). At these doses, mean pain intensities on a 0-100 visual analog scale were greater for FD than controls [56.9 (95% confidence intervals, 52.2-61.5) vs 45.1 (41.6-48.6), resp.] (P = 0.005). Overall, mean somatic sensory and pain thresholds were similar in FD and control groups, but in a subgroup of FD pain hypersensitivity was seen on the hand and on the foot at different stimulation thresholds.
CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: A majority of patients with FD have visceral chemo-hypersensitivity involving TRPV(1) pathways. A substantial subgroup also has somatic hypersensitivity as evidence of central sensitization.