MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.neurol.2018.01.379

Медицинская библиотека · Revue neurologique · 2018

Guillain-Barré syndrome subtypes: A clinical electrophysiological study of 100 patients.

Grapperon A-M, Berro M, Salort-Campana E, Verschueren A, Delmont E, Attarian S

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

A retrospective analysis was performed to document the clinical and electrophysiological features of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) subtypes using different diagnostic criteria.

METHODS

One hundred GBS patients were included. Clinical and laboratory features were analyzed, and patients were classified according to four sets of diagnostic criteria. Electrodiagnostic criteria were also analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 69 patients met Asbury and Cornblath's criteria, 96 met Van der Meché's criteria, 99 met Wakerley's diagnostic classification and 86 met level 1 or 2 of the Brighton criteria. Rates of GBS subtypes were: 69% classic GBS; 8% Miller-Fisher syndrome; 12% paraparetic GBS; 2% pharyngeal-cervical-brachial GBS; and 9% unclassified. Those for electrodiagnostic subtypes were 52% demyelinating and 9% axonal according to Hadden's criteria vs 41% demyelinating and 41% axonal as per Rajabally's criteria.

CONCLUSION

In this study of case distribution within the GBS spectrum of a retrospective cohort of French patients, the application of new diagnostic criteria enabled accurate diagnoses and classifications of the different subtypes, and also increased the recognition of axonal GBS.

Для цитирования: Grapperon A-M, Berro M, Salort-Campana E, Verschueren A, Delmont E, Attarian S. Guillain-Barré syndrome subtypes: A clinical electrophysiological study of 100 patients.. Revue neurologique. 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.neurol.2018.01.379.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.