MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3109/10826080009148425

Медицинская библиотека · Substance use & misuse · 2000

The impact of T-ACASI interviewing on reported drug use among men who have sex with men.

Gribble J N, Miller H G, Cooley P C, Catania J A, Pollack L, Turner C F

Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка службы здравоохранения СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Measurements of drug use and other illicit or stigmatized behaviors are subject to nontrivial underreporting biases. During in-person surveys, respondents are more likely to report such behaviors when interviewed using techniques that maximize interviewee privacy, e.g., use of paper SAQs and audio-CASI rather than questioning by human interviewers. Until recently, respondents in telephone surveys could not be offered similar privacy. A new technology, telephone audio computer-assisted self-interviewing (T-ACASI) overcomes this limitation of telephone surveys by allowing respondents to respond to a computer. A randomized experimental test of T-ACASI was embedded in the Urban Men's Health Study (UMHS). UMHS surveyed a probability sample of 2,881 men from four United States cities and who reported having sex with men. Respondents interviewed using T-ACASI reported a higher prevalence of drug use and drug-related behaviors than respondents interviewed by human interviewers. However, survey respondents were more likely to break off an interview when the interview was conducted by a T-ACASI computer rather than by a human interviewer.

Для цитирования: Gribble J N, Miller H G, Cooley P C, Catania J A, Pollack L, Turner C F. The impact of T-ACASI interviewing on reported drug use among men who have sex with men.. Substance use & misuse. 2000. DOI: 10.3109/10826080009148425.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.