Progres en urologie : journal de l'Association francaise d'urologie et de la Societe francaise d'urologie · 1999
[Comparison of the quality of life of patients treated by surgery or radiotherapy in epidermoid cancer of the penis].
Сравнительное исследованиеАннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ficarra V, Mofferdin A, D'Amico A, Zanon G, Schiavone D, Malossini G, Mobilio G
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our work is to examine how partially or totally radical surgery and radiotherapy can weigh on quality of life in patients with squamous carcinoma of the penis, considering whether quality of life can be a good criterion in treatment options.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: We have interviewed 17 patients alive and disease-free (average follow-up 69.43 months) after surgical treatment or radiotherapy for cancer of the penis (emasculation, 2; total amputation of the penis, 2; partial penectomy, 11; radiotherapy, 2). Tests used: General Health Questionnaire (G.H.Q.-12 by D. Goldberg); Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (H.A.D.S.); Social Problem Questionnaire (S.P.Q.); Overall Sexual Functioning Questionnaire (O.S.F.Q); Family APGAR Questionnaire (F.A.Q.); Performance Status ECOG.
RESULTS: Thirty-five per cent of the patients presented limitations in their state of health and social problems. Anxiety was evident in 29.5% of the patients and depression in 6%. The global sexual function was compromised in 76.5%.
CONCLUSION: The profile of quality of life resulted compromised in the patients who had undergone radical surgical treatment. The sexual function was the most altered component. The impact of the pathology and its treatment on the other domains of quality of life proved less significant.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: We have interviewed 17 patients alive and disease-free (average follow-up 69.43 months) after surgical treatment or radiotherapy for cancer of the penis (emasculation, 2; total amputation of the penis, 2; partial penectomy, 11; radiotherapy, 2). Tests used: General Health Questionnaire (G.H.Q.-12 by D. Goldberg); Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (H.A.D.S.); Social Problem Questionnaire (S.P.Q.); Overall Sexual Functioning Questionnaire (O.S.F.Q); Family APGAR Questionnaire (F.A.Q.); Performance Status ECOG.
RESULTS: Thirty-five per cent of the patients presented limitations in their state of health and social problems. Anxiety was evident in 29.5% of the patients and depression in 6%. The global sexual function was compromised in 76.5%.
CONCLUSION: The profile of quality of life resulted compromised in the patients who had undergone radical surgical treatment. The sexual function was the most altered component. The impact of the pathology and its treatment on the other domains of quality of life proved less significant.