MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/00007435-199902000-00009

Медицинская библиотека · Sexually transmitted diseases · 1999

Networks of persons with syphilis and at risk for syphilis in Louisiana: evidence of core transmitters.

Rosenberg D, Moseley K, Kahn R, Kissinger P, Rice J, Kendall C, Coughlin S, Farley T A

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND AND

OBJECTIVES

Differences in sociodemographic attributes and healthcare access may explain differences in regional sexually transmitted disease rates but don't fully explain why syphilis persists disproportionately in certain populations.

GOAL OF THIS STUDY: To understand the behavioral epidemiology of syphilis, we conducted a social network analysis of persons with syphilis and their contacts and developed and applied a definition of core transmitters.

STUDY

DESIGN

We interviewed 10 index persons with primary or secondary untreated syphilis and 80 of their named sexual and social contacts.

RESULTS

Fourteen (16%) of 90 interviewed persons met the definition of core transmitters, 9 of whom had past or current syphilis. The other interviewed persons had only moderately risky behaviors. Seventy-eight (42%) of the network sexual contacts were connected directly or indirectly to a core transmitter.

CONCLUSION

This analysis suggests that syphilis transmission is maintained by a community with a small percentage of high-risk persons centrally placed amidst a larger group with moderately risky behavior.

Для цитирования: Rosenberg D, Moseley K, Kahn R, Kissinger P, Rice J, Kendall C, Coughlin S, Farley T A. Networks of persons with syphilis and at risk for syphilis in Louisiana: evidence of core transmitters.. Sexually transmitted diseases. 1999. DOI: 10.1097/00007435-199902000-00009.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.