Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2006
Demonstration of PDC-E1 subunits as major antigens in the complement-fixing fraction M4 and re-evaluation of PDC-E1-specific antibodies in PBC patients.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Berg Christoph P, Stein Gerburg M, Klein Reinhild, Pascu Maria, Berg Thomas, Kammer Winfried, Priemer Martin, Nordheim Alfred, Schulze-Osthoff Klaus, Gregor Michael, Wesselborg Sebastian, Berg Peter A
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) is characterized by the presence of antimitochondrial antibodies (AMA). Autoantibodies specific for the mitochondrial M4 antigen can be detected by a complement fixation test (CFT) but not by immunoblotting. The aim of this study was to elucidate the identity of the M4 antigen.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: M4 proteins were purified by affinity chromatography using IgG fractions of PBC marker sera being CFT positive (n=5) or negative (n=5) and identified by Western blotting, silver staining and sequence analysis. Further, a cohort of 57 PBC patients was tested for the reactivity to M4 and pyruvate dehydrogenase complex (PDC).
RESULTS: Two AMA patterns of the marker sera were visualized: CFT-positive sera were defined as PDC-E2(+)/E1(+) and the CFT-negative sera as PDC-E2(+)/E1(-). The major proteins in the M4 fraction could be related to the PDC-E1 subunits. A clear-cut association between anti-M4 reactivity in the CFT and the reactivity to both PDC subunits could also be documented in the cohort of 57 PBC patients showing anti-PDC-E1alpha and E1beta antibodies at a frequency of 74% and 67%.
CONCLUSIONS: CFT reactivity against M4 antigens could be preferentially identified as a reaction against PDC-E1. As PDC-E1 subunits as compared with PDC-E2 lack lipoyl-binding sites, they probably have to be considered as an independent and important target.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: M4 proteins were purified by affinity chromatography using IgG fractions of PBC marker sera being CFT positive (n=5) or negative (n=5) and identified by Western blotting, silver staining and sequence analysis. Further, a cohort of 57 PBC patients was tested for the reactivity to M4 and pyruvate dehydrogenase complex (PDC).
RESULTS: Two AMA patterns of the marker sera were visualized: CFT-positive sera were defined as PDC-E2(+)/E1(+) and the CFT-negative sera as PDC-E2(+)/E1(-). The major proteins in the M4 fraction could be related to the PDC-E1 subunits. A clear-cut association between anti-M4 reactivity in the CFT and the reactivity to both PDC subunits could also be documented in the cohort of 57 PBC patients showing anti-PDC-E1alpha and E1beta antibodies at a frequency of 74% and 67%.
CONCLUSIONS: CFT reactivity against M4 antigens could be preferentially identified as a reaction against PDC-E1. As PDC-E1 subunits as compared with PDC-E2 lack lipoyl-binding sites, they probably have to be considered as an independent and important target.