MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.adaj.2023.08.003

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of the American Dental Association (1939) · 2023

Initial loading of dexmedetomidine and continuous propofol sedation for prevention of delayed recovery: A randomized controlled trial.

Nakagawa Hikaru, Hanamoto Hiroshi, Kozu Fumi, Yokoe Chizuko, Maegawa Hiroharu, Kudo Chiho, Niwa Hitoshi

Рандомизированное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Sedation with continuous dexmedetomidine and bolus midazolam administration provides a lower incidence of unacceptable patient movement during procedures but requires a longer recovery time. The authors aimed to compare recovery time and unacceptable patient movement during sedation with initial loading of dexmedetomidine followed by continuous propofol infusion with those during sedation with continuous dexmedetomidine and bolus midazolam administration.

METHODS

In this prospective randomized controlled trial, 54 patients undergoing dental surgery and requiring intravenous sedation were assigned to either the dexmedetomidine and propofol group (n = 27, dexmedetomidine administered at 6 μg/kg/h for 5 minutes, followed by continuous propofol infusion using a target-controlled infusion) or the dexmedetomidine and midazolam group (n = 27, dexmedetomidine administered at 0.2-0.7 μg/kg/h continuously after the same initial loading dose with bolus midazolam). A bispectral index of 70 through 80 was maintained during the procedure. Patient movement that interfered with the procedure and time from the end of sedation to achieving a negative Romberg sign were assessed.

RESULTS

Times from the end of sedation to achieving a negative Romberg sign in the dexmedetomidine and propofol group (median, 14 minutes [interquartile range, 12-15 minutes]) were significantly shorter (P < .001) than in the dexmedetomidine and midazolam group (median, 22 minutes [interquartile range, 17.5-30.5 minutes]). The incidence of unacceptable patient movement was comparable between groups (n = 3 in the dexmedetomidine and propofol group, n = 4 in the dexmedetomidine and midazolam group; P = .999).

CONCLUSIONS

Sedation with a single loading dose of dexmedetomidine followed by continuous propofol infusion can prevent delayed recovery without increasing unacceptable patient movement.

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: The combination of dexmedetomidine and propofol may provide high-quality sedation for ambulatory dental practice. This clinical trial was registered in the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry. The registration number is UMIN000039668.

Для цитирования: Nakagawa Hikaru, Hanamoto Hiroshi, Kozu Fumi, Yokoe Chizuko, Maegawa Hiroharu, Kudo Chiho, Niwa Hitoshi. Initial loading of dexmedetomidine and continuous propofol sedation for prevention of delayed recovery: A randomized controlled trial.. Journal of the American Dental Association (1939). 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.adaj.2023.08.003.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.