Clinical oral implants research · 2021
Early implant placement in ridge preserved extraction sockets: A pre-clinical in vivo study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Rodriguez-Ortiz Gabriel, Chen Stephen, Davies Helen, Fitzgerald Wayne, Darby Ivan
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: The aim was to analyse the outcomes of early implant placement after 6 and 12 weeks of healing in ridge preserved sites in a canine model.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Implants were placed in second maxillary incisors sites in 9 dogs 6 weeks after grafting of the sockets with 90% deproteinized bovine bone mineral in 10% collagen matrix (DBBMC) and closure with resorbable type I/III porcine collagen matrix (PCM). The implants were randomly assigned to 6 (T6) and 12 (T12) weeks of healing.
RESULTS: The percentage of bone-to-implant contact (%BIC), old bone, new bone and residual DBBMC was similar between T6 and T12. In relation to the implant shoulder (IS), the original bone crest (IS-ROB) was more apical on the buccal than the palatal side. The regenerated bone crest (IS-C) and IS-ROB were similar between groups. However, the distance from IS to first bone-to implant contact (IS-fBIC) was significantly less in T12 compared with T6 (p = .022; Wilcoxon signed-rank test). The bucco-palatal ridge dimensions between T6 and T12 were similar.
CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that implants can successfully be placed early in ridge preserved maxillary second incisor sites and are osseointegrated by 6 weeks. There were significantly lower IS-fBIC values at 12 weeks than at 6 weeks on the buccal aspect. The original buccal bone crest underwent greater corono-apical resorption than the palatal crest. The %BIC, relative proportions of mineralized tissues and dimensions of the alveolar ridge demonstrated stability between 6 and 12 weeks of healing.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Implants were placed in second maxillary incisors sites in 9 dogs 6 weeks after grafting of the sockets with 90% deproteinized bovine bone mineral in 10% collagen matrix (DBBMC) and closure with resorbable type I/III porcine collagen matrix (PCM). The implants were randomly assigned to 6 (T6) and 12 (T12) weeks of healing.
RESULTS: The percentage of bone-to-implant contact (%BIC), old bone, new bone and residual DBBMC was similar between T6 and T12. In relation to the implant shoulder (IS), the original bone crest (IS-ROB) was more apical on the buccal than the palatal side. The regenerated bone crest (IS-C) and IS-ROB were similar between groups. However, the distance from IS to first bone-to implant contact (IS-fBIC) was significantly less in T12 compared with T6 (p = .022; Wilcoxon signed-rank test). The bucco-palatal ridge dimensions between T6 and T12 were similar.
CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that implants can successfully be placed early in ridge preserved maxillary second incisor sites and are osseointegrated by 6 weeks. There were significantly lower IS-fBIC values at 12 weeks than at 6 weeks on the buccal aspect. The original buccal bone crest underwent greater corono-apical resorption than the palatal crest. The %BIC, relative proportions of mineralized tissues and dimensions of the alveolar ridge demonstrated stability between 6 and 12 weeks of healing.