MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s40262-026-01659-9

Медицинская библиотека · Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2026

Protein Binding Determination of Cefepime, Flucloxacillin, Meropenem, Piperacillin and Tazobactam by Ultrafiltration in Critically Ill Patients: The Choice of Device Matters.

Gregoire Matthieu, Wallis Steven C, Williams Paul G, Won Hayoung, Hernández-Mitre María Patricia, Abdul-Aziz Mohd H, Roberts Jason A

СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND AND

OBJECTIVE

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) and pharmacokinetic studies of beta-lactam antibiotics in critically ill patients aim to define optimal dosing and require accurate measurement of unbound drug concentrations. This study compared the performance of two ultrafiltration devices, Centrifree and Amicon, for measuring unbound concentrations of cefepime, meropenem, flucloxacillin, piperacillin and tazobactam.

METHODS

Non-specific binding (NSB) was specifically assessed in phosphate-buffered saline, and unbound concentrations were measured using a chromatographic method in both spiked plasma and plasma samples from critically ill patients, in order to compare the two ultrafiltration devices.

RESULTS

Centrifree exhibited no significant NSB for any antibiotics (≤ 15%), while Amicon displayed significant NSB for meropenem (26-61%), flucloxacillin (18-58%) and piperacillin (15-72%), resulting in lower unbound concentrations in both patient and spiked plasma samples compared to Centrifree. Additionally, piperacillin, and to a lesser extent flucloxacillin, demonstrated concentration-dependent NSB with Amicon. The comparative mean ± standard deviation of unbound fractions in intensive care unit (ICU) patients were as follows: cefepime, 0.85 ± 0.12 (Centrifree) versus 0.90 ± 0.10 (Amicon); meropenem, 0.87 ± 0.07 (Centrifree) versus 0.77 ± 0.05 (Amicon); flucloxacillin, 0.25 ± 0.13 (Centrifree) versus 0.18 ± 0.13 (Amicon); piperacillin, 0.91 ± 0.07 (Centrifree) versus 0.67 ± 0.13 (Amicon); and tazobactam, 0.97 ± 0.08 (Centrifree) versus 0.95 ± 0.08 (Amicon).

CONCLUSION

These findings underscore significant differences in results between ultrafiltration devices, depending on the drug, influenced by NSB. Such factors should be considered when developing methods for determining unbound concentrations of beta-lactam antibiotics.

Для цитирования: Gregoire Matthieu, Wallis Steven C, Williams Paul G, Won Hayoung, Hernández-Mitre María Patricia, Abdul-Aziz Mohd H, Roberts Jason A. Protein Binding Determination of Cefepime, Flucloxacillin, Meropenem, Piperacillin and Tazobactam by Ultrafiltration in Critically Ill Patients: The Choice of Device Matters.. Clinical pharmacokinetics. 2026. DOI: 10.1007/s40262-026-01659-9.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.