Pleomorphic Adenoma: Extracapsular Dissection vs. Superficial Parotidectomy-An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background/

Objectives

The aim of our study was to evaluate clinical outcomes in patients with small pleomorphic adenoma (PA) after extracapsular dissection (ED) versus superficial parotidectomy (SP).

Methods

Following the PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review covering the years from 1950 to 2025 was conducted using the Pubmed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Ovid MEDLINE and Embase databases. A single-arm meta-analysis was performed to evaluate intraoperative capsular rupture, recurrence, transient and permanent facial nerve palsy, Frey's syndrome, salivary fistula, seroma and hematoma of patients who underwent ED vs. those who underwent SP, and funnel plots were constructed to evaluate the robustness of the findings.

Results

Of the 1793 identified papers, 21 articles met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis (2507 patients) reported the following: (1) the risk of recurrence is similar in patients treated with ED and SP; (2) the transient facial nerve palsy rate is lower after ED (p < 0.05), while the permanent facial nerve palsy rate is similar with ED and SP; (3) post-operative complications, especially Frey's syndrome (p < 0.05), are more common after SP.

Conclusions

Given the similar recurrence rate and the lower morbidity compared to SP, ED could be considered the treatment of choice for pleomorphic adenomas of the parotid gland that are up to 3 cm in size, mobile and located in the superficial lobe of the parotid gland.