MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.12.029

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of the American College of Surgeons · 2012

Adherence to a simplified management algorithm reduces morbidity and mortality after penetrating colon injuries: a 15-year experience.

Sharpe John P, Magnotti Louis J, Weinberg Jordan A, Parks Nancy A, Maish George O, Shahan Charles P, Fabian Timothy C, Croce Martin A

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяВалидационное исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Our previous experience with colon injuries suggested that operative decisions based on a defined algorithm improve outcomes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the validity of this algorithm in the face of an increased incidence of destructive injuries observed in recent years.

STUDY

DESIGN

Consecutive patients with full-thickness penetrating colon injuries over an 8-year period were evaluated. Per algorithm, patients with nondestructive injuries underwent primary repair. Those with destructive wounds underwent resection plus anastomosis in the absence of comorbidities or large pre- or intraoperative transfusion requirements (more than 6 units packed RBCs); otherwise they were diverted. Outcomes from the current study (CS group) were compared with those from the previous study (PS group).

RESULTS

There were 252 patients who had full-thickness penetrating colon injuries: 150 (60%) patients had nondestructive colon wounds treated with primary repair and 102 patients (40%) had destructive wounds (CS). Demographics and intraoperative transfusions were similar between CS and PS groups. Of the 102 patients with destructive injuries, 75% underwent resection plus anastomosis and 25% underwent diversion. Despite more destructive injuries managed in the CS group (41% vs 27%), abscess rate (18% vs 27%) and colon-related mortality (1% vs 5%) were lower in the CS. Suture line failure was similar in CS compared with PS (5% vs 7%). Adherence to the algorithm was >90% in the CS (similar to PS).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite an increase in the incidence of destructive colon injuries, our management algorithm remains valid. Destructive injuries associated with pre- or intraoperative transfusion requirements of more than 6 units packed RBCs and/or significant comorbidities are best managed with diversion. By managing the majority of other destructive injuries with resection plus anastomosis, acceptably low morbidity and mortality can be achieved.

Для цитирования: Sharpe John P, Magnotti Louis J, Weinberg Jordan A, Parks Nancy A, Maish George O, Shahan Charles P, Fabian Timothy C, Croce Martin A. Adherence to a simplified management algorithm reduces morbidity and mortality after penetrating colon injuries: a 15-year experience.. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.12.029.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.