MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105277

Медицинская библиотека · Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2023

Memory biases in Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment. A systematic review and metanalysis.

De Vita Dalila, Sagliano Laura, Trojano Luigi

Систематический обзорМетаанализСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Several studies demonstrated that individuals are more likely to remember emotional than neutral information; this phenomenon is known as emotional enhancement of memory (EEM). Adults generally tend to remember negative information more efficiently than neutral or positive items. In contrast, healthy elders seem to show an opposite bias for positive information, but results are inconsistent, also because during aging, elaboration of emotional information could change as a consequence of cognitive impairment. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we conducted literature search of studies investigating emotion memory biases in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) on PubMed, Scopus and PsycINFO databases following PRISMA guidelines. The findings showed that emotional memory biases are still present despite the presence of cognitive impairment, both in MCI and at least in early stages of AD. However, the direction of emotion memory biases is not consistent across studies. These results suggest that patients with cognitive impairment might still benefit from EEM and help to define targets of intervention for cognitive rehabilitation in pathological aging.

Для цитирования: De Vita Dalila, Sagliano Laura, Trojano Luigi. Memory biases in Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment. A systematic review and metanalysis.. Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews. 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105277.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.