MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jormas.2025.102434

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of stomatology, oral and maxillofacial surgery · 2025

Periauricular incision vs. Modified blair incision in parotidectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Du Tian Ci, Dong Kai Lin, Liu Xin Tang, Mao Wen Jian, Liu Jian She, Liu Ye Jun

СтатьяСистематический обзорМетаанализСравнительное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To compare safety, functional outcomes, and cosmetic results of periauricular incision (PI) versus modified Blair incision (MBI) in superficial benign parotidectomy.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing parotidectomy with PI versus MBI. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CBM, CNKI, Wanfang, and VIP databases were searched through April 20, 2025 (PROSPERO: CRD42024620827). Outcomes included transient facial palsy, Frey's syndrome, earlobe numbness, facial deformity, patient satisfaction, salivary fistula, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage, hospital stay, and incision length. The risk of bias was assessed with RoB 2 and evidence certainty was graded by GRADE.

RESULTS

Eleven RCTs encompassing 804 patients (PI 401; MBI 403) met the inclusion criteria. Pooled analysis demonstrated that PI significantly reduced transient facial palsy (RR = 0.60, 95 % CI: 0.39-0.93; moderate certainty), Frey's syndrome (RR = 0.27, 95 % CI: 0.13-0.55; high certainty), earlobe numbness (RR = 0.53, 95 % CI: 0.34-0.84; moderate certainty), and facial deformity (RR = 0.19, 95 % CI: 0.08-0.46; high certainty), as well as higher patient satisfaction (RR = 1.24, 95 % CI: 1.16-1.33; moderate certainty). No significant difference was observed in salivary fistula incidence (RR=0.70; 95 % CI, 0.31-1.59; low certainty) and operative time (SMD=-0.29; 95 % CI, -1.30-0.71; very low certainty). Intraoperative bleeding, postoperative drainage, hospitalization length, and incision length favored PI, but evidence quality was downgraded to low/very low due to high heterogeneity (I² = 72-97 %).

CONCLUSION

PI appears to be a safe, cosmetically superior alternative to MBI for small-to-medium benign, superficial parotid tumors. Further multicenter, high-quality RCTs with long-term follow-up are warranted to confirm these findings.

Для цитирования: Du Tian Ci, Dong Kai Lin, Liu Xin Tang, Mao Wen Jian, Liu Jian She, Liu Ye Jun. Periauricular incision vs. Modified blair incision in parotidectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.. Journal of stomatology, oral and maxillofacial surgery. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.jormas.2025.102434.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.