Acta neurologica Scandinavica · 2013
Inhaled dry powder apomorphine (VR040) for 'off ' periods in Parkinson's disease: an in-clinic double-blind dose ranging study.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Grosset K A, Malek N, Morgan F, Grosset D G
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: 'Off' periods increase as Parkinson's disease (PD) progresses and the benefits of standard therapy wane. Subcutaneous apomorphine rescues 'off' periods, but patient self-injection and adverse cutaneous effects are sometimes problematic.
METHODS: We assessed safety, tolerability and efficacy of inhaled dry powder apomorphine (VR040) in a double-blind clinic-based Phase II study. Of 48 patients recruited at nine sites, 47 were randomized 2:1 inhaled apomorphine/placebo. Respirable doses (drug predicted to reach the lung), ascending through 1.5, 2.3, 3.0 and 4.0 mg until efficacy was achieved, were administered to patients in a practically defined 'off' state. The primary endpoint was the response in unified PD rating scale Part 3 (UPDRS 3), at the highest dose received by the patient. Secondary endpoints included time to 'on', the proportion of patients converting from 'off' to 'on', and duration of 'on'.
RESULTS: In the 47 intent-to-treat patients with PD, mean age 60.6 years, the mean UPDRS 3 improvement was significantly greater for VR040 at 26.8 points (standard deviation 12.0), vs 14.9 (16.3) for placebo (treatment difference 11.6, 95% confidence interval 2.3-20.9, P = 0.016). Rapid apomorphine absorption (2-7 min) translated to rapid (mean 10 min) reversal from the 'off' state. Adverse effects did not differ between VR040 and placebo; no patient discontinued due to an adverse event; one serious adverse event (constipation) in the VR040 group was considered unrelated to trial medication.
CONCLUSIONS: Inhaled apomorphine shows significant promise as a replacement for intermittent subcutaneous injections; further studies are appropriate to optimize efficacy and tolerability.
METHODS: We assessed safety, tolerability and efficacy of inhaled dry powder apomorphine (VR040) in a double-blind clinic-based Phase II study. Of 48 patients recruited at nine sites, 47 were randomized 2:1 inhaled apomorphine/placebo. Respirable doses (drug predicted to reach the lung), ascending through 1.5, 2.3, 3.0 and 4.0 mg until efficacy was achieved, were administered to patients in a practically defined 'off' state. The primary endpoint was the response in unified PD rating scale Part 3 (UPDRS 3), at the highest dose received by the patient. Secondary endpoints included time to 'on', the proportion of patients converting from 'off' to 'on', and duration of 'on'.
RESULTS: In the 47 intent-to-treat patients with PD, mean age 60.6 years, the mean UPDRS 3 improvement was significantly greater for VR040 at 26.8 points (standard deviation 12.0), vs 14.9 (16.3) for placebo (treatment difference 11.6, 95% confidence interval 2.3-20.9, P = 0.016). Rapid apomorphine absorption (2-7 min) translated to rapid (mean 10 min) reversal from the 'off' state. Adverse effects did not differ between VR040 and placebo; no patient discontinued due to an adverse event; one serious adverse event (constipation) in the VR040 group was considered unrelated to trial medication.
CONCLUSIONS: Inhaled apomorphine shows significant promise as a replacement for intermittent subcutaneous injections; further studies are appropriate to optimize efficacy and tolerability.