MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/pxr.0000000000000169

Медицинская библиотека · Prosthetics and orthotics international · 2022

Cognitive screening in persons with an amputation: A retrospective medical record audit.

Dawes Erinn, Bliokas Vida, Hewitt Lyndel, Wilson Val

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To determine the rate of cognitive screening undertaken with patients undergoing amputation and to determine the demographics of the sample.

STUDY

DESIGN

Retrospective medical record audit.

METHODS

The medical records of a convenience sample of persons who had undergone amputation, upper and lower limb, from one local health district were reviewed. The sample date range was between January 1st, 2017, and December 31st, 2018. The incidence and type of cognitive screening were also recorded. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the results.

RESULTS

A total of 178 episodes of amputation care were identified during retrospective medical record auditing (mean age, 69.7 years). Thirty nine of the 178 (21.9%) episodes of care had a cognitive screening measure completed during that inpatient admission (24.2% vascular etiology and 12% nonvascular etiology). All cognitive screens were completed in persons with lower-limb amputations and were completed postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

Cognitive screening is not a routine part of the health care journey for patients with an amputation in this health care district.

Для цитирования: Dawes Erinn, Bliokas Vida, Hewitt Lyndel, Wilson Val. Cognitive screening in persons with an amputation: A retrospective medical record audit.. Prosthetics and orthotics international. 2022. DOI: 10.1097/pxr.0000000000000169.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.