Frontiers in allergy · 2026
Mepolizumab reduces systemic corticosteroid-related toxicities and healthcare burden in patients with eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis and hypereosinophilic syndrome: a retrospective database study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Pongdee Thanai, Silver Jared, Deb Arijita, Laliberte Francois, Gao Chi, Hilts Annalise, Zhang Kaixin, Liu Daisy, Edgecomb Amy G
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Systemic corticosteroids (SCS) remain the cornerstone of eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) and hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES) therapy but are associated with substantial toxicity. Mepolizumab, an anti-interleukin-5 biologic, has demonstrated steroid-sparing effects in addition to EGPA and HES disease control, yet evidence of reductions in SCS-related complications is limited.
METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used US claims data from the Komodo Research Database to quantify SCS-related complications, healthcare resource utilization, and costs in patients with EGPA or HES treated with mepolizumab vs. chronic SCS. Patients were stratified as mepolizumab (300 mg) or chronic SCS users (≥6 months continuous SCS use with >7.5 mg/day for EGPA and >10 mg/day for HES) based on treatment received during a 6-month landmark period post-index (first claim of mepolizumab or SCS). An inverse probability of treatment weighting approach was applied to the cohorts to minimize confounding. Outcomes were assessed up to 12 months post-landmark.
RESULTS: 578 patients with EGPA (305 mepolizumab users vs. 273 chronic SCS users) and 272 patients with HES (161 vs. 111) were included. In patients with EGPA, rates of any SCS-related complications were 39% lower with mepolizumab compared with chronic SCS (rate ratio [95% confidence interval]: 0.61 [0.49, 0.76], p < 0.001). Mepolizumab users had 57% lower rate of all-cause hospitalizations (0.43 [0.27, 0.69], p < 0.001), and lower outpatient and emergency department (ED) visits vs. chronic SCS. Patients with HES had significantly lower rates of any SCS-related complications with mepolizumab vs. chronic SCS (0.59 [0.42, 0.82], p = 0.002). Mepolizumab users had 66% lower rates of all-cause hospitalizations (0.34 [0.17, 0.65], p = 0.001), and lower outpatient visits relative to chronic SCS users. In EGPA and HES SCS-complication-related hospitalizations and ED visits were lower with mepolizumab compared with chronic SCS. SCS-complication-related medical costs per patient per year were $16,194 (p = 0.008) and $3,976 (p = 0.676) lower, in the mepolizumab vs. chronic SCS cohort of patients with EGPA and HES, respectively.
CONCLUSION: This first of its kind study suggests that real-world mepolizumab use is associated with reduced SCS-related complications in EGPA and HES, reinforcing its clinical and economic steroid-sparing benefits in reducing healthcare burden among EGPA and HES populations.
METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used US claims data from the Komodo Research Database to quantify SCS-related complications, healthcare resource utilization, and costs in patients with EGPA or HES treated with mepolizumab vs. chronic SCS. Patients were stratified as mepolizumab (300 mg) or chronic SCS users (≥6 months continuous SCS use with >7.5 mg/day for EGPA and >10 mg/day for HES) based on treatment received during a 6-month landmark period post-index (first claim of mepolizumab or SCS). An inverse probability of treatment weighting approach was applied to the cohorts to minimize confounding. Outcomes were assessed up to 12 months post-landmark.
RESULTS: 578 patients with EGPA (305 mepolizumab users vs. 273 chronic SCS users) and 272 patients with HES (161 vs. 111) were included. In patients with EGPA, rates of any SCS-related complications were 39% lower with mepolizumab compared with chronic SCS (rate ratio [95% confidence interval]: 0.61 [0.49, 0.76], p < 0.001). Mepolizumab users had 57% lower rate of all-cause hospitalizations (0.43 [0.27, 0.69], p < 0.001), and lower outpatient and emergency department (ED) visits vs. chronic SCS. Patients with HES had significantly lower rates of any SCS-related complications with mepolizumab vs. chronic SCS (0.59 [0.42, 0.82], p = 0.002). Mepolizumab users had 66% lower rates of all-cause hospitalizations (0.34 [0.17, 0.65], p = 0.001), and lower outpatient visits relative to chronic SCS users. In EGPA and HES SCS-complication-related hospitalizations and ED visits were lower with mepolizumab compared with chronic SCS. SCS-complication-related medical costs per patient per year were $16,194 (p = 0.008) and $3,976 (p = 0.676) lower, in the mepolizumab vs. chronic SCS cohort of patients with EGPA and HES, respectively.
CONCLUSION: This first of its kind study suggests that real-world mepolizumab use is associated with reduced SCS-related complications in EGPA and HES, reinforcing its clinical and economic steroid-sparing benefits in reducing healthcare burden among EGPA and HES populations.