m+Medelevator.RU
← Поиск публикаций
Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2025

Efficacy and safety of a novel, extended-release rivastigmine transdermal patch (TW-4752N) in patients with Alzheimer's disease: A 24-week randomized, double-blind trial with a 28-week open-label extension.

СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеМногоцентровое исследованиеКлиническое исследование III фазыПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Nakamura Yu, Kurokawa Takaya, Terashima Shun, Nishimura Akira

Аннотация

BackgroundRivastigmine may offer greater efficacy and convenience of use with a novel formulation than previously reported.ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of a novel, twice-weekly rivastigmine patch (TW-4752N) (TW) in Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients with mild to moderate dementia.MethodsThis was a multicenter, phase III, double-blind study comparing TW and an existing rivastigmine transdermal patch (RT) with an open-label extension. The primary endpoint was the change in ADAS-Jcog total score at week 24 from baseline. Secondary endpoints included the ADAS-Jcog total score at weeks 8, 16, and 24.ResultsA total of 354 and 362 patients were available for efficacy and safety analysis, respectively. Changes in ADAS-Jcog total score at week 24 from baseline were similar between the two groups in the full analysis set with an intergroup difference of -0.84 ± 0.44 (95% CI, -1.695 to 0.016) and with the upper limit of the 95% CI being below the non-inferiority margin of 1.1, demonstrating the non-inferiority of TW. However, analysis of the per-protocol set demonstrated a significant intergroup difference in favor of TW likely suggesting a greater treatment effect with TW than with RT (p = 0.032). Adverse events (AEs) reported in ≥3% of patients were similar between the groups, with the only AE with an intergroup difference of ≥10% in incidence being application site pruritus (TW/RT, 27.6%/17.1%).ConclusionsTW represents a viable alternative option of interest to patients with AD, providing comparable or potentially greater efficacy than RT and comparable safety, as well as greater convenience of use.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

ИП Урсолов Владлен Сергеевич

ИНН 500118482352 · ОГРНИП 314500117700049

Реквизиты и контакты