Japanese journal of ophthalmology · 2004
Sclerosing sweat duct carcinoma of the eyelid.
Клинический случайСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kodama Tatsuo, Tane Nobuhiro, Ohira Akihiro, Maruyama Riruke, Fukuyama Junichiro
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Sclerosing sweat duct carcinoma (SSDC) is a rare variant of sweat gland carcinomas. We report a case of SSDC of the eyelid.
CASE: A 33-year-old woman presented with a painless, slowly enlarging nodule in her left lower eyelid. Incisional biopsy revealed proliferated ducts lined by two layers of epithelium embedded in a dense fibrous stroma. Cytologic atypia was not evident. Initial histopathological diagnosis was a syringoma or an inflammatory reaction.
OBSERVATIONS: Four years after initial biopsy, the mass had enlarged slightly. Madarosis was observed thereafter. The lesion was excised completely with frozen section evaluation of the margins and repaired by a semicircular rotation flap. Microscopically, variable sized tubular structures could be seen invading the deep dermis and muscle. The final diagnosis was SSDC.
CONCLUSIONS: This tumor is seldom recognized and is frequently confused with benign syringoma or inflammation. Wide and deep excisional biopsy is necessary for correct diagnosis and successful treatment.
CASE: A 33-year-old woman presented with a painless, slowly enlarging nodule in her left lower eyelid. Incisional biopsy revealed proliferated ducts lined by two layers of epithelium embedded in a dense fibrous stroma. Cytologic atypia was not evident. Initial histopathological diagnosis was a syringoma or an inflammatory reaction.
OBSERVATIONS: Four years after initial biopsy, the mass had enlarged slightly. Madarosis was observed thereafter. The lesion was excised completely with frozen section evaluation of the margins and repaired by a semicircular rotation flap. Microscopically, variable sized tubular structures could be seen invading the deep dermis and muscle. The final diagnosis was SSDC.
CONCLUSIONS: This tumor is seldom recognized and is frequently confused with benign syringoma or inflammation. Wide and deep excisional biopsy is necessary for correct diagnosis and successful treatment.