MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.4103/0970-0218.96095

Медицинская библиотека · Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine · 2012

Mass drug administration coverage evaluation survey for lymphatic filariasis in bagalkot and gulbarga districts.

Patel Prakash Kurubarahalli

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Lymphatic filariasis (LF) is endemic in 83 countries and territories, with more than a billion people at risk of infection. In view with the global elimination, mass drug administration (MDA) with single dose of diethylcarbamazine and albendazole tablets was carried out for the eligible population in Bagalkot and Gulbarga districts.

OBJECTIVE

Assess coverage of MDA against LF in Bagalkot and Gulbarga districts.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

In this cross-sectional coverage evaluation survey, one urban and three rural clusters were selected randomly in each district. The data were collected in a pretested performa, computed and analyzed using SPSS-10 to calculate frequencies and proportions.

RESULTS

A total of eight clusters in two districts resulted in a total study population of 1,228 individuals. The overall compliance rate in Bagalkot district was 78.6% and in Gulbarga district it was only 38.8%. The prime reason for noncompliance was fear of side effects and not received tablets.

CONCLUSION

There is an urgent need for more effective drug delivery strategies to improve the compliance in both the districts.

Для цитирования: Patel Prakash Kurubarahalli. Mass drug administration coverage evaluation survey for lymphatic filariasis in bagalkot and gulbarga districts.. Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine. 2012. DOI: 10.4103/0970-0218.96095.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.