Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2005
The Proseal LMA is a useful rescue device during failed rapid sequence intubation: two additional cases.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Cook Tim M, Brooks Tony S, Van der Westhuizen Joreline, Clarke Michael
Аннотация
PURPOSE: We report two cases where the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway (PLMA) was successfully used as a rescue device, after failed tracheal intubation, during rapid sequence induction.
CLINICAL FINDINGS: The first case involved a 31-yr-old primigravida presenting for emergency Cesarean section for severe fetal distress. She had a grade 3 larynx and airway edema was observed during laryngoscopy. Attempts with a McCoy blade and gum elastic bougie failed to secure the airway. A size 4 PLMA was inserted with good airway control and surgery proceeded uneventfully. The second case involved a 51-yr-old man presenting for appendectomy. Following failed attempts at intubation, a size 5 PLMA was successful in securing his airway and surgery proceeded uneventfully.
CONCLUSIONS: The correctly placed PLMA has potential advantages over the cLMA for airway rescue in the circumstance of failed emergency intubation in a patient with a potentially full stomach. In the two cases reported, the PLMA provided effective rescue of the airway.
CLINICAL FINDINGS: The first case involved a 31-yr-old primigravida presenting for emergency Cesarean section for severe fetal distress. She had a grade 3 larynx and airway edema was observed during laryngoscopy. Attempts with a McCoy blade and gum elastic bougie failed to secure the airway. A size 4 PLMA was inserted with good airway control and surgery proceeded uneventfully. The second case involved a 51-yr-old man presenting for appendectomy. Following failed attempts at intubation, a size 5 PLMA was successful in securing his airway and surgery proceeded uneventfully.
CONCLUSIONS: The correctly placed PLMA has potential advantages over the cLMA for airway rescue in the circumstance of failed emergency intubation in a patient with a potentially full stomach. In the two cases reported, the PLMA provided effective rescue of the airway.