MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/bf03015775

Медицинская библиотека · Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2005

The Proseal LMA is a useful rescue device during failed rapid sequence intubation: two additional cases.

Cook Tim M, Brooks Tony S, Van der Westhuizen Joreline, Clarke Michael

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: We report two cases where the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway (PLMA) was successfully used as a rescue device, after failed tracheal intubation, during rapid sequence induction.

CLINICAL FINDINGS: The first case involved a 31-yr-old primigravida presenting for emergency Cesarean section for severe fetal distress. She had a grade 3 larynx and airway edema was observed during laryngoscopy. Attempts with a McCoy blade and gum elastic bougie failed to secure the airway. A size 4 PLMA was inserted with good airway control and surgery proceeded uneventfully. The second case involved a 51-yr-old man presenting for appendectomy. Following failed attempts at intubation, a size 5 PLMA was successful in securing his airway and surgery proceeded uneventfully.

CONCLUSIONS

The correctly placed PLMA has potential advantages over the cLMA for airway rescue in the circumstance of failed emergency intubation in a patient with a potentially full stomach. In the two cases reported, the PLMA provided effective rescue of the airway.

Для цитирования: Cook Tim M, Brooks Tony S, Van der Westhuizen Joreline, Clarke Michael. The Proseal LMA is a useful rescue device during failed rapid sequence intubation: two additional cases.. Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie. 2005. DOI: 10.1007/bf03015775.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.