International journal of cardiology · 2016
Management and outcome of patients with acute myocardial infarction presenting with pacemaker rhythm.
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bertel Noemi, Witassek Fabienne, Puhan Milo, Erne Paul, Rickli Hans, Naegeli Barbara, Pedrazzini Giovanni, Stauffer Jean-Christophe, Radovanovic Dragana
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (MI) is challenging in pacemaker patients. Little is known about this patient group.
METHODS: Patients with MI enrolled in the Swiss national AMIS Plus registry between January 2005 and December 2015 were analyzed. All patients with either paced ventricular rhythm or sinus rhythm with intrinsic ventricular conduction (IVC) were included in this study. Outcomes using crude data and propensity score matching were compared between patients with pacemaker rhythm and patients with IVC. The primary endpoint was in-hospital death.
RESULTS: Data from 300 patients with paced rhythm and 27,595 with IVC were analyzed. Patients with pacemaker rhythm were older (78.2y vs 65.4y; p<0.001), had more comorbidities (Charlson Index (CCI)>1: 54.0% vs 21.1%; p<0.001) and a higher rate of heart failure upon presentation (Killip class>2, 11.0% vs 5.9%; p<0.001) compared to patients with IVC. Door to balloon time in patients undergoing acute PCI is markedly delayed in contrast to patients with IVC (280min vs 85min; p<0.001). Consequently, crude mortality in patients with pacemakers was high (11.3% vs 4.6%; p<0.001). However, when analyzed with propensity matching for gender, age, CCI>1 and Killip>2, mortality was similar (11.2% vs 10.5%; p=0.70).
CONCLUSION: Pacemaker patients with acute MI represent a high-risk group with doubled crude mortality compared to patients without pacemakers, due to higher age and higher Killip class. Diagnosis is difficult and results in delayed treatment. Treatment algorithms for MI with paced rhythm should possibly be adapted to those used for STEMI or new left bundle branch block.
CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT01305785.
METHODS: Patients with MI enrolled in the Swiss national AMIS Plus registry between January 2005 and December 2015 were analyzed. All patients with either paced ventricular rhythm or sinus rhythm with intrinsic ventricular conduction (IVC) were included in this study. Outcomes using crude data and propensity score matching were compared between patients with pacemaker rhythm and patients with IVC. The primary endpoint was in-hospital death.
RESULTS: Data from 300 patients with paced rhythm and 27,595 with IVC were analyzed. Patients with pacemaker rhythm were older (78.2y vs 65.4y; p<0.001), had more comorbidities (Charlson Index (CCI)>1: 54.0% vs 21.1%; p<0.001) and a higher rate of heart failure upon presentation (Killip class>2, 11.0% vs 5.9%; p<0.001) compared to patients with IVC. Door to balloon time in patients undergoing acute PCI is markedly delayed in contrast to patients with IVC (280min vs 85min; p<0.001). Consequently, crude mortality in patients with pacemakers was high (11.3% vs 4.6%; p<0.001). However, when analyzed with propensity matching for gender, age, CCI>1 and Killip>2, mortality was similar (11.2% vs 10.5%; p=0.70).
CONCLUSION: Pacemaker patients with acute MI represent a high-risk group with doubled crude mortality compared to patients without pacemakers, due to higher age and higher Killip class. Diagnosis is difficult and results in delayed treatment. Treatment algorithms for MI with paced rhythm should possibly be adapted to those used for STEMI or new left bundle branch block.
CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT01305785.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AgedAlgorithmsBundle-Branch BlockElectrocardiographyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHeart RateHeart VentriclesHospital MortalityHumansMaleMyocardial InfarctionMyocardial RevascularizationPacemaker, ArtificialPropensity ScoreRegistriesRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSurvival RateSwitzerlandThrombolytic Therapy