Journal of anesthesia · 1999
Effects of sevoflurane and enflurane on lower esophageal sphincter pressure and gastroesophageal pressure gradient in children.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kohjitani A, Shirakawa J, Satoh E, Kagawa T, Nakajima M, Obara H
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The effects of sevoflurane and enflurane on the intraluminal pressure of the lower esophagus (LE), lower esophageal sphincter (LES), and stomach were investigated in paralyzed and mechanically ventilated children under general anesthesia.
METHODS: A total of 14 children, ASA physical status class I without risk factors for regurgitation, scheduled for orthopedic surgery were studied. After induction of anesthesia, we inserted a gastrointestinal pressure sensor nasally and monitored the intraluminal pressure of the LE, LES, and stomach under various concentrations of sevoflurane or enflurane with 66% nitrous oxide in oxygen prior to surgical incision. The barrier pressure (BrP), which is the difference between LES pressure and intragastric pressure, was calculated.
RESULTS: Sevoflurane at 2.0 and 2.5 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) decreased LES pressure, and enflurane at 2.0 and 2.5 MAC decreased both LES pressure and BrP in anesthetized children. The intraluminal pressure of the LE and stomach were not altered in either group.
CONCLUSION: Sevoflurane and enflurane have an inhibitory effect on LES smooth muscle in anesthetized children. However, since the reduction was relatively low, even at high concentrations, these inhalation anesthetics are unlikely to influence gastroesophageal reflux during anesthesia.
METHODS: A total of 14 children, ASA physical status class I without risk factors for regurgitation, scheduled for orthopedic surgery were studied. After induction of anesthesia, we inserted a gastrointestinal pressure sensor nasally and monitored the intraluminal pressure of the LE, LES, and stomach under various concentrations of sevoflurane or enflurane with 66% nitrous oxide in oxygen prior to surgical incision. The barrier pressure (BrP), which is the difference between LES pressure and intragastric pressure, was calculated.
RESULTS: Sevoflurane at 2.0 and 2.5 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) decreased LES pressure, and enflurane at 2.0 and 2.5 MAC decreased both LES pressure and BrP in anesthetized children. The intraluminal pressure of the LE and stomach were not altered in either group.
CONCLUSION: Sevoflurane and enflurane have an inhibitory effect on LES smooth muscle in anesthetized children. However, since the reduction was relatively low, even at high concentrations, these inhalation anesthetics are unlikely to influence gastroesophageal reflux during anesthesia.