MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2016.06.012

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of electrocardiology · 2016

ECG evaluation in patients with pacemaker and suspected acute coronary syndrome: Which score should we apply?

Freitas Pedro, Santos Miguel Borges, Faria Mariana, Rodrigues Gustavo, Vale Nélson, Teles Rui Campante, Almeida Manuel, Mendes Miguel

Сравнительное исследованиеОценочное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: In patients with right ventricular pacing, the ECG shows a left bundle branch block (LBBB) pattern. There are several criteria to diagnose ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in patients with LBBB. The aim of this study was to validate and compare Sgarbossa's with two new scores - Selvester's and Smith's - in this context.

METHODS

We identified pacemaker patients submitted to coronary angiography due to acute coronary syndrome. ECGs were analyzed by 2 blinded cardiologists. STEMI was defined according to angiographic and biochemical criteria. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were calculated.

RESULTS

Forty-three patients with ventricular pacing were included for analysis. STEMI was diagnosed in 26 patients (60%). The most sensitive score was Selvester's (38.5%; 95% CI: 20.2-59.4) while the most specific was Sgarbossa's (100%; 95% CI: 80.5-100).

CONCLUSIONS

The sequential application of these scores proved to be clinically useful in the context of STEMI.

Для цитирования: Freitas Pedro, Santos Miguel Borges, Faria Mariana, Rodrigues Gustavo, Vale Nélson, Teles Rui Campante, Almeida Manuel, Mendes Miguel. ECG evaluation in patients with pacemaker and suspected acute coronary syndrome: Which score should we apply?. Journal of electrocardiology. 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2016.06.012.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.