Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2003
The PAxpress is an effective ventilatory device but has an 18% failure rate for flexible lightwand-guided tracheal intubation in anesthetized paralyzed patients.
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Dimitriou Vasilios, Voyagis Gregory S, Iatrou Christos, Brimacombe Joseph
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The PAxpress is a new, single-use, extraglottic airway device. We evaluate: 1) insertion success rates; 2) airway sealing pressure, ventilatory capability and calculated mucosal pressures (in vitro minus in vivo intracuff pressure) at 30-60 mL cuff inflation volume; 3) the feasibility of lightwand-guided tracheal intubation; and 4) the incidence of mucosal trauma.
METHODS: Ninety anesthetized, paralyzed adults were studied. Airway management was by senior anesthesiologists with no prior experience with the PAX, but considerable experience with extraglottic airway devices and the flexible-lightwand.
RESULTS: Insertion was successful at the first attempt in 95.5% (86/90) and at the second attempt in 4.5% (4/90). Mean +/- SD airway sealing pressure at 30, 40, 50 and 60 mL cuff inflation volume was 27 +/- 8, 29 +/- 9, 32 +/- 9 and 35 +/- 7 cm H(2)O respectively; expired tidal volume at airway sealing pressure was 16 +/- 6, 18 +/- 6, 19 +/- 5 and 19 +/- 6 mL.kg(-1); and calculated mucosal pressure was 38 +/- 14, 55 +/- 20, 56 +/- 19 and 57 +/- 20 cm H(2)O. Airway sealing pressure, expired tidal volume at airway sealing pressure and calculated mucosal pressures increased with cuff inflation volume (all: P < or = 0.0002). Esophageal leak was detected in 9% (8/90), but only at peak pressures > or = 35 cm H(2)O and cuff inflation volumes > or = 40 mL. Lightwand-guided intubation was successful in 82% (74/90) of patients. Mild, moderate and severe blood staining was detected in 40% (36/90), 15% (13/90) and 1% (1/90) respectively. Blood staining was more frequent after adjusting maneuvers (22/54 vs 32/36, P = 0.002).
CONCLUSION: The PAX has a high insertion success rate and is an effective ventilatory device with a low risk of gastric insufflation, but has a moderately high failure rate for lightwand-guided intubation and is associated with a relatively high incidence of mucosal trauma. Mucosal pressures may exceed pharyngeal perfusion pressure.
METHODS: Ninety anesthetized, paralyzed adults were studied. Airway management was by senior anesthesiologists with no prior experience with the PAX, but considerable experience with extraglottic airway devices and the flexible-lightwand.
RESULTS: Insertion was successful at the first attempt in 95.5% (86/90) and at the second attempt in 4.5% (4/90). Mean +/- SD airway sealing pressure at 30, 40, 50 and 60 mL cuff inflation volume was 27 +/- 8, 29 +/- 9, 32 +/- 9 and 35 +/- 7 cm H(2)O respectively; expired tidal volume at airway sealing pressure was 16 +/- 6, 18 +/- 6, 19 +/- 5 and 19 +/- 6 mL.kg(-1); and calculated mucosal pressure was 38 +/- 14, 55 +/- 20, 56 +/- 19 and 57 +/- 20 cm H(2)O. Airway sealing pressure, expired tidal volume at airway sealing pressure and calculated mucosal pressures increased with cuff inflation volume (all: P < or = 0.0002). Esophageal leak was detected in 9% (8/90), but only at peak pressures > or = 35 cm H(2)O and cuff inflation volumes > or = 40 mL. Lightwand-guided intubation was successful in 82% (74/90) of patients. Mild, moderate and severe blood staining was detected in 40% (36/90), 15% (13/90) and 1% (1/90) respectively. Blood staining was more frequent after adjusting maneuvers (22/54 vs 32/36, P = 0.002).
CONCLUSION: The PAX has a high insertion success rate and is an effective ventilatory device with a low risk of gastric insufflation, but has a moderately high failure rate for lightwand-guided intubation and is associated with a relatively high incidence of mucosal trauma. Mucosal pressures may exceed pharyngeal perfusion pressure.