The Annals of thoracic surgery · 2016
Comparison of Conservative Treatment and Thymectomy on Myasthenia Gravis Outcome.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяСистематический обзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Taioli Emanuela, Paschal Philip Kent, Liu Bian, Kaufman Andrew J, Flores Raja M
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: A systematic review of the literature was performed to compare long-term outcomes of thymectomy and medical treatment for generalized myasthenia gravis (MG).
METHODS: A Medline search through June 2015 resulted in 71 studies, 27 of which were selected (10,140 patients: 5,275 thymectomies, 4,865 medication).
RESULTS: The pooled proportion of remission with thymectomy was 0.31 (95% CI, 0.25-0.37), with conservative treatment it was 0.15 (95% CI, 0.12-0.18). The odds ratio (OR) of remission with thymectomy in comparison with medication alone was 2.44 (95% CI, 1.91-3.12) overall and according to medication type and remission definitions.
CONCLUSIONS: Thymectomy is superior to conservative treatment with solely medication on remission in MG.
METHODS: A Medline search through June 2015 resulted in 71 studies, 27 of which were selected (10,140 patients: 5,275 thymectomies, 4,865 medication).
RESULTS: The pooled proportion of remission with thymectomy was 0.31 (95% CI, 0.25-0.37), with conservative treatment it was 0.15 (95% CI, 0.12-0.18). The odds ratio (OR) of remission with thymectomy in comparison with medication alone was 2.44 (95% CI, 1.91-3.12) overall and according to medication type and remission definitions.
CONCLUSIONS: Thymectomy is superior to conservative treatment with solely medication on remission in MG.