MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/mus.25552

Медицинская библиотека · Muscle & nerve · 2017

Exercise in myasthenia gravis: A feasibility study of aerobic and resistance training.

Rahbek Martin Amadeus, Mikkelsen Erik Elgaard, Overgaard Kristian, Vinge Lotte, Andersen Henning, Dalgas Ulrik

СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

It has not been established whether progressive resistance training (PRT) and aerobic training (AT) are feasible and efficient in myasthenia gravis (MG).

METHODS

Fifteen subjects with generalized MG (Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) clinical classification II-IV) were randomly assigned to 20 training sessions during 8 weeks of either PRT or AT. Feasibility was evaluated based on adherence, drop-out rate, adverse events, and Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) score.

RESULTS

Twelve subjects (MGFA II, n = 11; MGFA III, n=1) completed the intervention with a mean adherence of 95 % ± 8. One dropout (PRT) could potentially be related to PRT. Both groups reported adverse events, including bulbar symptoms (n = 2) and increased fatigue (n = 3), but no change in QMG score was observed in either group. The PRT group showed increases in maximal strength and functional capacity.

CONCLUSIONS

Eight weeks of moderate to high intensity AT and PRT were feasible for most patients with mild MG. Maximal strength and functional capacity increased in the PRT group. Muscle Nerve 56: 700-709, 2017.

Для цитирования: Rahbek Martin Amadeus, Mikkelsen Erik Elgaard, Overgaard Kristian, Vinge Lotte, Andersen Henning, Dalgas Ulrik. Exercise in myasthenia gravis: A feasibility study of aerobic and resistance training.. Muscle & nerve. 2017. DOI: 10.1002/mus.25552.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.